• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • Choke Point

    Water and New Development Path Are Priorities in U.S.-China Climate Agreement

    November 18, 2014 By Keith Schneider

    AJ-fisherman-IMG_9981_smallNEW DELHI, India – There are nearly 1.3 billion people in this swarming democracy, where over 66 percent of eligible voters cast ballots in the general election last May. A few of them took me aside this week to express surprise at the puzzle that is the American electorate and its national leadership.

    Inner Mongolia
    Coal trucks in Inner Mongolia – Click to enlarge. © Tobey Smith/Circle of Blue

    NEW DELHI, India – There are nearly 1.3 billion people in this swarming democracy, where over 66 percent of eligible voters cast ballots in the general election last May. A few of them took me aside this week to express surprise at the puzzle that is the American electorate and its national leadership.

    It’s easy to see why.

    On November 4, despite the most money ever spent in a national election ($3.7 billion), just over a third of eligible American voters – the lowest percentage since 1942 – felt it necessary to cast a ballot to influence the country’s management.

    The two nations appear to be trying to do something truly significant

    But just eight days later, on November 12, the president of the United States reached a momentous accord with the president of China to cap greenhouse gas emissions and do a whole lot more for Mother Earth and its human inhabitants.

    Though viewed here in India and by most observers globally as an environmental accord, the pact’s six major provisions boil down to a new international economic development strategy.

    The agreement sets out two politically arduous but technically achievable goals:

    1. Turn major industries, particularly the institutions that supply electricity, into technologically advanced, water-conserving, low-carbon, pollution-avoiding guardians of environmental safety and human well-being.
    2. Redesign cities to be much cleaner, much greener, much healthier, and much more efficient users of water, energy, land, and other natural resources.

    In effect, the agreement sets out to either convert or overrun skeptics in the carbon-based industries and their allies in government and finance. It does so by encouraging collaboration between the two largest economies, and the crowd of inventors and practitioners in both countries, to much more quickly put into place new tools, new practices, and especially new markets to contend with radically different ecological and economic conditions.

    Temporarily putting aside political realities in both nations and the skepticism fostered by decades of reporting in the U.S. and more recently in China, the two nations appear to be trying to do something truly significant.

    Responding to Environmental Change

    President Barack Obama, Xi Jinping, and their aides very clearly recognize the new malevolence displayed by Planet Earth in the 21st century.

    Bricks to a new foundation for people to survive and thrive in a perilous ecological age

    Unlike the 20th century, when so many people died by the barrel of a gun, massive industrial accidents like the 1984 chemical explosion that killed nearly 16,000 people here in Bhopal, and man-instigated holocaust and genocide, the 21st century’s biggest threats to human life are acts of nature that seem unnatural in their fury and consequence: floods, droughts, earthquakes, tsunamis, pestilence, and new plagues. All stem from a combination of soaring population growth and resource waste that is producing rising costs, political intransigence, and surprising civic indifference.

    They seem to be looking at the searing storm of environmental and economic transition square in the eye and presenting a concerted response that comes straight from the shoulder. The changes the agreement calls for in water conservation, efficiency, clean energy, green equipment, and the like are the bricks to a new foundation for people to survive and thrive in a perilous ecological age.

    Not until last week has such a useful and transparent call to action come from the highest reaches of government in the United States and China.

    The Yellow River
    China’s Yellow River – Click to enlarge. © Aaron Jaffe/Circle of Blue

    The most basic details of the climate aspects of the agreement call for reducing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions 26 percent to 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. China, for its part, put the first-ever limit on its greenhouse gas emissions, asserting that they will reach a peak in 2030 and that non-fossil fueled sources will make up a fifth of its electrical generating capacity.

    The United States should easily reach its target. In 2005, U.S. greenhouse emissions were just over 7 billion metric tons a year, according to the U.S Environmental Protection Agency. Reaching the agreement’s goals will drop U.S. greenhouse emissions to roughly 5 billion metric tons a year. Last year, greenhouse emissions in the U.S. dropped to around 6.2 billion metric tons as buildings, cars, and planes become more energy efficient, and natural gas, wind, and solar power replaced coal for generating electrical power.

    How Significant Is It?

    Predictably and sadly, Republican lawmakers last week criticized the agreement as a risk to the American economy. Though conservative U.S. legislators have fought every previous big American environmental measure for the same reason, the economic data shows a different story. U.S. GDP, $16 trillion this year in constant dollars, is more than three times larger than it was in 1970, when the first Earth Day was celebrated. America, by the way, is a lot cleaner than it was then.

    Chinese coal consumption is growing 100 million metric tons annually

    The Chinese greenhouse gas limits are, flat out, underwhelming. A fifth of China’s electrical generating capacity already comes from no-carbon power sources, as the agreement stipulates. And the agreement allows China to continue escalating the levels of carbon it pours into the air before it reaches a peak in 2030. By then, it may be too late.

    This year China is producing and consuming 3.6 billion metric tons of coal – almost four times as much as the United States. Chinese coal consumption is growing 100 million metric tons annually. Unless there is a sharp change in policy, coal consumption in China could reach 5.2 billion metric tons a year. The effects on health and environment are almost unimaginable.

    I’m told by James Fallows, a correspondent and expert China observer, that it’s the first-of-its-kind limit on emissions that’s important. My good friend and colleague, Jennifer Turner of the Wilson Center and a collaborator with Circle of Blue in this work, agrees.

    “The efforts that the Chinese are teeing up to get even more aggressive on coal are significant,” Jennifer wrote to me in an email. “It will still take a lot of wrestling over tough policy, finance, and regulatory stuff that will really determine if China will just make this a business-as-usual Himalayan-sized peak or something lower. Lots of experts in my network are saying that China can likely hit a coal peak sooner.”

    Water-Energy Choke Point Highlighted

    The water conservation and use provisions of the agreement are also globally significant, as well as personally gratifying to those of us at Circle of Blue and the Wilson Center.

    The agreement includes two provisions to secure freshwater supplies in energy production – the so-called “energy-water nexus” that we have reported on since 2010.

    The two nations are 1) investing in research to improve efficiency and conservation in water supply for energy generation, and 2) developing a carbon sequestration demonstration project in China to put produced water from deep beneath the surface and displaced by CO2 storage to good use.

    Circle of Blue and the Wilson Center played a big role in elevating the contest between rising demand for energy (second largest water consumer in both countries) and diminishing freshwater supplies in our 2010 “Choke Point: U.S.” project, and our 2011 and 2012 “Choke Point: China” projects. The Wilson Center and Circle of Blue collaborated to bring our findings to civic, academic, government, and NGO audiences in both countries, including speaking tours in China in 2011, 2012, and 2013.

    Clearly, leaders of both nations took note. India, the third largest producer of coal, needs to be next.

    Keith Schneider, who developed the Global Choke Point project, is senior editor and chief correspondent at Circle of Blue. A two-time winner of the George Polk Award and other honors for his work, he also reports on energy, agriculture, the environment, and policy for The New York Times, where he has served as a national correspondent and contributor since 1981.

    Sources: The Atlantic, Bloomberg, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Photo Credit: Used with permission courtesy of Tobey Smith and Aaron Jaffe/Circle of Blue.

    Topics: Asia, China, Choke Point, climate change, coal, consumption, cooperation, development, economics, energy, environment, environmental health, featured, foreign policy, India, international environmental governance, meta, natural resources, U.S., water
    • Nora Sullivan

      Great article. Thank you for pointing out that it is really an economic agreement. With the understanding that environment can create potential for conflict, then the conflict between the environment and the economy is one war that must come to resolution.

    • Marshall Cooper

      It sounds like the US will be able to meet their goal of reducing greenhouse gas
      emissions to “26.28% below 2005 levels by 2025,” as we are already reducing our
      emissions a little each year. I think it will be interesting to see if we can
      stick to our commitment to reduce these emissions after the next presidential
      election. It’s also interesting that China has committed to reducing their
      emissions, and that they are already on their way to meeting their projected
      goal of “a fifth of their electrical generating capacity coming from no-carbon
      power sources.” But, it appears as though they did not commit to going past
      that level to being mostly run on no-carbon energy sources. I think that is
      something that they will face as more countries start committing to reducing
      greenhouse gas emissions. Do you think that China will be able to implement
      policies to curb their use of fossil fuels? It’s great that two of the largest
      carbon emitting countries have made a pledge to start looking closely at energy
      use and water conservation and how they can implement changes to start reducing
      their impacts on the planet.

    • Abrar

      It is great that United States and China start that, and their step would influences other countries to follow them.

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • 49890944808_c7d6dfef74_c Why Feminism Is Good for Your Health
    Melinda Cadwallader: "Feminism materializes through investment in human capital and caregiving sectors of the economy...
  • 49890944808_c7d6dfef74_c Why Feminism Is Good for Your Health
    Melinda Cadwallader: People who refuse to acknowledge patriarchy are often the ones who benefit from it. So please, say...
  • Water desalination pipes A Tale of Two Coastlines: Desalination in China and California
    Dr S Sundaramoorthy: It is all fine as theory. What about the energy cost? Arabian Gulf has the money from its own oil....

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000