• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • China Environment Forum

    China’s Waste Import Ban: Dumpster Fire or Opportunity for Change?

    July 19, 2018 By Guo Chen
    Empty Chinese plastic bottles ready to be recycled

    In early January of this year, China’s “National Sword” policy banned imports of non-industrial plastic waste. The ban forces exporting countries to find new dumping grounds for their waste, which is estimated to total nearly 111 million metric tons by 2030. China’s decision has exposed deep structural flaws and interdependencies in the global waste management system. Western countries that have long depended on China to take their garbage are now struggling to deal with mounds of plastic trash, while China lacks the low-priced labor needed to effectively sort and process waste.

    The Impending Waste Crisis

    In 2016, China imported 56 percent of the world’s solid waste. Unsurprisingly, China’s sweeping reforms have been met with pushback and complaints from waste-exporting countries that this will leave them on the brink of a “waste crisis.” Critics include the European Union, which sends 87 percent of its total recycled plastic directly or indirectly to China. United States recyclers have also criticized the policy, specifically the short notice, a lack of clarity on which materials are banned, and what they deem to be an “impossible” standard of less than 0.3 percent contaminants.

    The United States’ representatives at the WTO asked China to halt the plan, citing concerns that it would lead to job losses in the recycling industry. Meanwhile, some experts optimistically predict that this is “a chance to slash waste” and transition to a new era of recycling. At the same time, China’s news media reports that other countries simply “have to adapt” and take responsibility for disposing of their own waste.

    China’s policy has an economic rationale in addition to the environmental justifications. By banning waste imports, China is hoping to improve the quality of imported recyclables, as contaminated recyclables had become an increasing problem in China. Less contamination will reduce sorting costs and the amount of waste that ends up in Chinese landfills.

    Ripple Effects for Migrant Workers

    This hardline talk follows decades of relative silence from the Chinese government. Awareness of China’s overflowing trash problem or waste recycling in general is limited, even though environmentalists and NGOs have been investigating China’s long-term struggle with its domestic recycling industry.

    Since the 1980s, local government recycling efforts have decreased, leaving a gap that migrant laborers and entrepreneurs have filled. This informal waste-management scheme provided work for a significant number of waste pickers and recyclers in large cities such as Beijing. But the new waste import ban threatens the livelihoods of many of these migrant workers.

    This threat is exacerbated by the government’s efforts to push individuals deemed to be members of Beijing’s “low-end population” out of the city. Both the waste management sector and the migrants serving in it have been discriminated against for decades. As this population is forced to leave their homes and their jobs, they leave behind a vacuum in Beijing’s waste management system—one that won’t be mitigated by banning foreign waste.

    Man sits with his freight bike of recyclabel materials

    Integrated Solutions Could Reduce Injustice

    China’s waste ban exposes the intricate nexus connecting social, economic, and environmental issues within China and internationally. Some predict the ban could act as a catalyst, prompting the government to develop more innovative solutions. The “low-end” or “dirty” sectors, or those “undesirable” spaces that city planners want to eliminate, are not the culprits in creating China’s waste problems. Instead, the increasingly affluent and consumerist population, compounded by the lack of promoting public awareness and incentivizing recycling, are mostly to blame.

    Although the trash ban will help, it alone is not a long-term solution. That will require effective waste management systems, as well as a nuanced understanding of the socio-economic dynamics of Chinese cities. China must find a way to not only integrate the informal recycling sector into a more efficient recycling system, but also to include new employment opportunities for informal waste-sector workers. As China enters a new front in its war on pollution, failure to address these socio-economic and environmental issues in an integrated manner runs the risk of exacerbating a persistent social divide and increasing environmental injustice.

    Guo Chen is an Associate Professor of Geography and Global Urban Studies at Michigan State University

    Sources: The Age, Cal Recycle, China Daily, China US Focus, The Conversation, Independent, Law of China, Reuters, QZ, Waste360, WTO

    Photo credits:

    Empty Chinese plastic bottles ready to be recycled. Flickr/Carsten ten Brink

    Man sits with his freight bike of recyclable materials. Flickr/David Barrie

    A shortened version of the commentary is published with China US Focus at https://www.chinausfocus.com/energy-environment/chinas-waste-import-ban-a-wake-up-call-but-for-who

    Thanks to Tianyi Fan and Teng Zhang for their work on compiling the news.

    Topics: Asia, China, China Environment Forum, community-based, consumption, economics, environment, Europe, featured, foreign policy, Infrastructure, Japan, livelihoods, migration, poverty, sanitation, U.S., urbanization

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • Rainforest destruction. Gold mining place in Guyana China’s Growing Environmental Footprint in the Caribbean
    ZingaZingaZingazoomzoom: US cleans up. China runs wild on free rein- A lack of international compliance mechanisms to hold...
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous souhaitons que le partenaire nous apporte son soutien technique et financier.
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous sommes une organisation féminine dénommée: Actions Communautaires pour le Développement de...

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000