• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • Guest Contributor

    “Food Power”: American Postwar Diplomacy and Food for Peace

    April 17, 2018 By Bethany N. Bella
    USAID-Helicopter-AID-Delive

    Food has long been used by countries to wage both war and peace, and the post-war era of American food dominance is no exception. Bryan McDonald, a professor at Pennsylvania State University, traces the United States’ “Food For Peace” strategy in his recent book, Food Power: The Rise and Fall of the Postwar American Food System, arguing that “food was central to national security” during this period.

    “These efforts also demonstrated the ability to utilize food as a form of assistance to those in need while also establishing the success of the American way in the postwar years,” McDonald writes. “Abundance was the foundation of an international food system, and the United States was at its center.”

    Food Aid: A National Security Tool

    “Food is one of the main ways that we structure our relationship with other people and the environment on a day-to-day basis,” McDonald said in an interview. “The impact of human relationships with food goes way beyond the act of eating.”

    In Food Power, McDonald explores the evolution of American food policy during the mid-20th century, documenting how the United States deliberately deployed its “food power” after World War II to achieve diplomatic aims favorable to U.S. democracy.

    American foreign food assistance was a stabilizing force for global markets

    American foreign food assistance was a stabilizing force for global markets, boosting the United States’ legitimacy as a democratic world leader both at home and abroad. “Food was always valuable, but in the wake of a global food crisis from 1972 to 1974, there was renewed attention to the link between food and security,” McDonald writes.

    “The ability of the United States to dispense food to help those in need—even the Soviet Union—was something that government leaders would point to again and again as evidence that the American system was superior to communism,” McDonald writes.

    Today, there are far fewer small, independent American farmers, due to increased mechanization, industrial farming techniques, and large corporate acquisitions. But the food industry still matters a great deal to the American economy—and to its growing appetite.

    “Very few people in America actually grow food, but one in nine jobs in the United States is related to food,” McDonald said. “Economic vibrancy is a core part of what makes us a great nation, and yet we’re not really focusing on how can we provide stability and good lives for the people who are producing food.”

    The last time food played a major part in an American presidential campaign, McDonald argues, was during the 1960 election of President John F. Kennedy.

    Since then, “We’ve been lulled in a sense by our lived experiences, in a world where most of Americans have enough food to eat,” McDonald said.

    The Future of Food Assistance

    One of the reasons the United States was a successful superpower in the post-war era, McDonald argues, is its “constant involvement” in humanitarian efforts and diplomacy overseas.

    “Historically, the peace, the prosperity, the stability we saw—it wasn’t an accident,” McDonald said. “The U.S. was deeply engaged in the world. We were willing to fund development…we were making progress on public health goals, and it cascaded forward.

    “Historically, the peace, the prosperity, the stability we saw—it wasn’t an accident”

    “You get this incredible period of peace and stability – and no food crisis.”

    But when “the Cold War ends, and the U.S. and the Soviet Union stop providing a lot of the assistance that they were providing, we get into this period of uncertainty, a period of instability,” McDonald said.

    Recently, as nationalist politics have surged in the United States and Europe, some have threatened to draw down foreign aid and instead focus on their own infrastructure and development. 

    According to McDonald, the global development framework now looks more like a “patchwork—it’s not a tightly woven blanket that is focused on the needs of countries, the needs of people in those countries.”

    “Food is too critical a component in global peace and prosperity to be left to the heightened by short-lived attention it receives during a crisis,” McDonald writes.

    In addition, climate change may disrupt agricultural patterns and upend food security. “We don’t know what’s going to happen,” McDonald said. “That’s the climate reality that we live in.”

    “If you look at every trend out there – climate change, the number of hungry people in the world, the number of people who are acutely food insecure, the number of people displaced from conflict—all of those tell you that we are headed in the wrong direction,” McDonald said.

    These food security and climate change trends have ramifications for national security. “The landscape of security threats that the U.S. is facing is shifting,” McDonald said. “We’re making a dangerous bet, to move into a more uncertain future through not investing—not just overseas, but in ourselves.

    “Do we want to trust to luck, or do we want to make our own luck?”

    Bethany N. Bella is a Bachelor of Specialized Studies senior studying environmental geography and women’s & gender studies at Ohio University. Find her on Twitter or visit her website.

    Sources: Pew Research

    Photo Credit: Humanitarian operations on Panay Island, Philippines, June 2008, courtesy of DVIDSHUB.

    Topics: agriculture, development, disaster relief, featured, Feed the Future, food security, foreign policy, Guest Contributor, humanitarian, security, U.S.
    • Huiying Ng

      Thank you for the article! If I am reading this right, its general point is a summary of Bryan McDonald’s point, that food aid contributed to America’s role in enabling global stability by ensuring the needy were fed. Having not read his book, might I ask if he had also covered the statements made by other writers on the role of US development aid contracts in binding Third World countries to accepting US food donations, while being bound to transition to an export-led agricultural sector? I accept that he comes from a national security perspective. Yet, to stay with his argument that “Abundance was the foundation of an international food system, and the United States was at its center,” one would also have to selectively overlook the notion that a truly abundant food system would not have needed the US to be at the centre of it (it would be region-specific; and there would not have been the necessity for US food aid). It would also overlook many arguments that have been marshalled over the years to show how the US and other nations created scarcity narratives in order to generate new markets for the incredible mass of food products they were generating, at world-historical rates only possible because of the new machinery, industrial energy consumption and accompanying costs to soil fertility, environment and food crop diversity that such agricultural production was directly contributing to. I accept his argument that US food aid was integral to American national security policy and keeping the winds of luck, but his argument seems hypocritical and violent when he suggests the world has a problem of hunger that can be solved by the same thinking behind US food aid. Especially violent in the context of this blog (that also looks at global energy security and refugee dispossession and migration). The argument keeps development aid and foreign policy within the same, post-WWII paradigm of global security premised on a dependent relationship, one that devalues local knowledge and systems of food production. It won’t resolve issues that climate change will surface, which will happen in highly localized ways requiring strong local institutions free of constraining, exploitative relations with a higher power. Exploitation and control has cascading effects downwards, whereas support for non-dependent institutional empowerment grows the abilities of local economies to be abundant in and of themselves.

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • Rainforest destruction. Gold mining place in Guyana China’s Growing Environmental Footprint in the Caribbean
    ZingaZingaZingazoomzoom: US cleans up. China runs wild on free rein- A lack of international compliance mechanisms to hold...
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous souhaitons que le partenaire nous apporte son soutien technique et financier.
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous sommes une organisation féminine dénommée: Actions Communautaires pour le Développement de...

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000