• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • How Effective Is the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative? And a Transatlantic Food Security Strategy

    April 28, 2016 By Gracie Cook

    EITI ImageSovacool et al. in a study published in World Development compare the performance of the first 16 member countries of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) to their performance before membership and to other non-member countries and find little difference in most governance and economic development categories. The authors write that this is the first empirical data-driven report to assess the initiative. Compared to a sample of non-member countries, the EITI countries had similar rates of improvement in sectors such as corruption, political stability, and rule of law, as measured by the World Bank’s Worldwide Governance Indicators. The authors credit these results to the “limited mandate” of EITI, which cannot effectively promote transparency in public spending or account for corrupt activities of individuals within the extractive industries. Additionally, they recognize the voluntary nature of EITI, transparency resistance from stakeholders, and EITI’s dependence on a strong civil society as contributing factors to lower-than-anticipated improvements. As more countries and companies active in the oil, gas, and mining industries support and recognize EITI, this research may provide insights into how to improve results.

    RR Adelphi picIn a brief by the Center for American Progress and adelphi, Michael Werz and Benjamin Pohl present ways the United States and Europe can work as a team to address global food security challenges. “Volatility is likely to be the new normal as climate change, demographic shifts, and other factors continue to reshape the global environment in the years and decades ahead,” write the authors. Food security has become an international security issue in the wake of two major food price crises in the last 10 years and as population levels rise and more countries become reliant on imports. The authors focus specifically on the Arab Spring’s illumination of the links between climate change, energy, food, and security, and recommend a joint effort by transatlantic partners in all sectors to prevent future crises. In particular, they propose improved access to food industry data, sharing technological innovations, the balancing of humanitarian and structural development assistance, and the creation of improved global food security governance structures to ensure aid is coordinated effectively. The authors address the importance of a long-term approach between the United States and European countries to dealing with climate change and food security, and write that “it is paramount that [transatlantic] dialogue and action address not only the crisis of the day, but also the structural challenges.”

    Sources: adelphi, Center for American Progress, World Development.

    Topics: conflict, cooperation, demography, development, economics, energy, environment, environmental security, food security, funding, international environmental governance, Middle East, natural gas, natural resources, oil, population, poverty

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous souhaitons que le partenaire nous apporte son soutien technique et financier.
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous sommes une organisation féminine dénommée: Actions Communautaires pour le Développement de...
  • hongqiao-liu1 As China Adjusts for “True Cost” of Rare Earths, What Does It Mean for Decarbonization?
    Anthony Maw: It is just another one of those "inconvenient truths". Western defense and security analysts often...

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000