• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • From the Wilson Center

    Religion and Reproductive Rights: Looking For Common Ground

    September 23, 2013 By Jacob Glass
    Faith-and-Rights-Photo

    More than 84 percent of the 2010 world population – 5.8 billion people – consider themselves religiously affiliated, according to a recent study. Religious leaders can therefore have significant influence across a broad range of social, economic, and political issues. Perhaps nowhere is that influence felt more strongly than in debates about reproductive health and rights, and perhaps nowhere are the consequences so large than in poor and marginalized communities.

    As the sexual rights, population, and human rights communities review the operationalization and effectiveness of the landmark 1994 International Conference on Population and Development, which established access to family planning as a human right, there is a need to better understand the intersection of faith and reproductive health. A private event held at the Wilson Center on August 22, co-sponsored by the Global Interfaith and Secular Alliance, featured a panel of religious leaders and women’s health experts in a thoughtful discussion about this sometimes contentious issue.

    Narrow Debates, Broad Implications

    Despite Europe’s reputation for socio-political liberalism, Neil Datta, secretary of the European Parliamentary Forum on Population and Development, said that an increasing number of European public policies in the past decade have sought to restrict women’s reproductive rights, both directly and indirectly.

    Though these issues have long been a source of passionate debate throughout Europe, Datta noted that less controversial health services have recently been called into question. For example, he described a push to ban the European Union from funding maternal health programs in the developing world because some considered them a “slippery slope” towards other services. According to Marieme Helie Lucas, founder of Secularism Is a Women’s Issue and Women Living Under Muslim Laws, such attempts to infringe on women’s reproductive rights have become more prevalent in Europe and across the world, regardless of the particular religious context.

    In the Philippines, Magdalena Lopez, the international program director for Catholics for Choice, noted that the Philippine Catholic Church recently helped suspend a reproductive health bill. Besides blocking programs offering contraceptive services, the defeat of the law would cut funding for new women’s health facilities and midwife training aimed at making delivery and pregnancy safer for women and newborns. Such health interventions are sorely needed in a country where the maternal mortality rate is 99 per 100,000 live births, compared to an average of 20 per 100,000 in Europe.

    Where women’s rights are being denied, those most affected are those most vulnerable – the young, the old, the uneducated, and the poor, said Sivananthi Thanenthiran, executive director of the Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women. “Others have the means to escape such barriers.”

    Creative Ways of Moving Forward

    Ramon San Pascual, the executive director of the Asian Forum of Parliamentarians on Population and Development, emphasized the need to think creatively about bolstering support for maternal health issues. For example, he said the environmental community should be viewed as potential partners. By approaching reproductive health as part of an integrated population, health, and environment (PHE) development model that makes clear the varied socioeconomic effects it can have, more support can be leveraged to improve women’s lives. “These are linked issues,” San Pascal said.

    Rabbi Dennis Ross, director of Concerned Clergy for Choice, said his organization “reminds the public that there is more than one religious perspective about religious teachings.” If policymakers are made aware of interpretations that promote women’s wellbeing, they may be less likely to pass legislation restricting women’s rights to reproductive health services, he suggested.

    In noting the universality of human rights, dignity, and equality – values agreed upon by 179 countries at the International Conference on Population and Development – San Pascual said opportunities to forge common ground around these issues clearly exist.

    “Give every girl an equal say in the construction of the family and the ability to understand what is happening to her body,” he said. “I would like my daughter to have a choice.”

    Sources: Pew Research Center, United Nations Population Fund.

    Photo Credit: An Accredited Social Health Activist in Madhya Pradesh, courtesy of Nick Cunard/DFID.

    Topics: Asia, cooperation, development, Europe, family planning, featured, From the Wilson Center, funding, gender, global health, humanitarian, maternal health, PHE, Philippines, population, religion, U.S.
    • Steven Earl Salmony

      The AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population was founded in 2001. Since that moment I have seen it as a moral imperative to continue the work I’ve been doing for many years now: getting the message out and explaining to as many people as possible that human overpopulation of the Earth is occurring on our watch, that it poses profound existential risks for future human well being, life as we know it and environmental health, and that robust action is required starting here, starting now to honestly acknowledge, humanely address and eventually overcome.

    • Sam

      I think the MMR is missing a couple of zeros here. It should be 99 out of 100,000 births in the Philippines, not 99 out of 1000.

      • Jacob Glass

        Thanks, updated.

    • Rabbi Dennis S. Ross

      I was very pleased to be part of the conversation!

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • Rainforest destruction. Gold mining place in Guyana China’s Growing Environmental Footprint in the Caribbean
    ZingaZingaZingazoomzoom: US cleans up. China runs wild on free rein- A lack of international compliance mechanisms to hold...
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous souhaitons que le partenaire nous apporte son soutien technique et financier.
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous sommes une organisation féminine dénommée: Actions Communautaires pour le Développement de...

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000