• ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • Reading Radar

    Reaching Accord on Land Grabs, and Household Perceptions of Climate-Conflict Vulnerability

    February 9, 2017 By Azua (Zizhan) Luo

    Journal-of-Peasant-StudiesLarge-scale land acquisitions, otherwise known as “land grabbing,” are often believed to lead to resistance from affected local communities. According to an article by Ruth Hall et al. in The Journal of Peasant Studies, however, “political reactions ‘from below’ to global land grabbing have been vastly more varied and complex than is usually assumed.” The authors write that community resistance does sometimes result in benefits and some groups are more likely to cooperate with corporate actors than others. The event of incorporation or acquiescence – the demand to be included in land deals as workers or contract farmers, or acceptance of changes without protest – depends on numerous factors including class and identity politics, local and transnational alliances, and use of legal and extralegal negotiation methods. The authors suggest further research on gendered responses and intergenerational relationships to further understand how groups respond differently to land deals.

    vulnerableIn an article recently published in Regional Environmental Change, Uche Okpara, Lindsay Stringer, and Andrews Dougill discuss the development and application of a climate-water conflict vulnerability index to assess communities along the southeastern shores of Lake Chad in the Republic of Congo. The authors surveyed 240 resource users, including farmers, fishermen, and pastoralists, to determine household-level stressors in an attempt to uncover environmental conflicts between local communities. Out of the three groups, pastoralists reported feeling most vulnerable to water scarcity, while farmers reported high vulnerability to conflicts and aggression due to the encroachment of pastoralists onto farmland. This resource scarcity and disparity underlies approximately three quarters of all conflicts reported in the surveyed villages, according to the authors. Fishermen reported more vulnerability to climate-related losses but were better supported through social and political networks. The authors suggest development interventions for the villages target insufficient water supplies to decrease climate conflicts.

    Sources: The Journal of Peasant Studies, Regional Environmental Change.

    Topics: Africa, agriculture, climate change, community-based, conflict, development, environment, environmental security, gender, land, livelihoods, natural resources, Reading Radar, Republic of Congo, security

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • Closing the Women’s Health Gap Report: Much Needed Recognition for Endometriosis and Menopause
    Aditya Belose: This blog effectively highlights the importance of recognizing conditions like endometriosis &...
  • International Women’s Day 2024: Investment Can Promote Equality
    Aditya Belose: This is a powerful and informative blog on the importance of investing in women for gender equality!...
  • A Warmer Arctic Presents Challenges and Opportunities
    Dan Strombom: The link to the Georgetown report did not work

What We’re Reading

  • U.S. Security Assistance Helped Produce Burkina Faso's Coup
  • https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/02/02/equal-rights-amendment-debate/
  • India's Economy and Unemployment Loom Over State Elections
  • How Big Business Is Taking the Lead on Climate Change
  • Iraqi olive farmers look to the sun to power their production
More »

Related Stories

  • ECSP Weekly Watch | September 18 – 22
  • ECSP Weekly Watch | September 4 – 8
  • Q&A: Peter Schwartzstein on Conflict & Climate in Libya
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2025. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

T 202-691-4000