• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • Eye On  //  On the Beat

    What Paul Ehrlich Missed (and Still Does): The Population Challenge Is About Rights

    June 3, 2015 By Schuyler Null

    In 1968, Stanford University biologist Paul Ehrlich predicted hundreds of millions would starve to death over the next decade, many of them Americans, and the world would generally decline into chaos in his book The Population Bomb.

    A retrospective on Ehrlich’s forecast is the subject of a new “Retro Report” in The New York Times. A 12-minute video feature produced by Sarah Weiser with support from the Pulitzer Center is accompanied by a column from Clyde Haberman.

    “I do not think my language was too apocalyptic in The Population Bomb,” Ehrlich says in an interview, “my language would be even more apocalyptic today.” His basic premise remains true, he says: “We have a finite planet with finite resources and in such a system you can’t have infinite population growth.”

    “I was trying to bring people to get something done,” he says, and he still sees humanity’s dominance over the natural world as a danger to our own life-support system.

    But things have changed since The Population Bomb was published almost 50 years ago. Population growth has not continued unabated and in most parts of the world has slowed to at or below replacement level.

    It treats people like numbers and assumes they’re not capable of making “good” decisions

    One aspect of the story that is somewhat glossed over but helps explain these changes is about rights.

    “The idea that every woman should have as many babies as she wants is to me exactly the same kind of idea as everybody ought to be permitted to throw as much garbage into their neighbor’s backyard as they want,” says Ehrlich. The reason that is so reflexively offensive to most people – besides the fact it compares human beings to garbage – is the same reason forced sterilization is: it treats people like numbers and assumes they’re not capable of making “good” decisions on their own. Of all the ideas about population espoused during this time, this might be the most important fallacy.

    People – and not just women – have proven that given a choice and the means to exercise that choice, most will choose to have fewer children than the very high rates of fertility being experienced during the 1960s. Fertility rates in North America, Europe, Latin America, North Africa, and Asia have declined to near or under two children per woman. And even in sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, where fertility rates remain highest and population-scarcity concerns are still very real, they are also trending down.

    Contemporary conversations about global population and the environment therefore tend to focus on ensuring that people in fast-growing areas are able to exercise their reproductive rights and sustainably manage local natural resources. This idea was canonized during the 1994 International Conference on Population Development which established the primacy of rights over numbers-based policies. In some regions, access to contraceptives and related health services is still very poor. In others, gender dynamics make it difficult for women to make their own fertility decisions, whether because of child marriage, patriarchal traditions, or lack of education and employment for girls and women.

    “Just like politics, all population dynamics are local”

    Women’s empowerment, agency, education, access to health services – these are the contemporary population issues that development organizations and reproductive health and rights advocates are fighting for. “All too often media stories about population focus more on the wrongs of the past, rather than on the rights of today,” says Wilson Center Director of Population, Environmental Security, and Resilience Roger-Mark De Souza.

    Sadly, the focus on global numbers – either on the most rapidly growing places in the world (there are too many, we’re doomed!) or the least (there are too few, we’re doomed!) – often wins our attention.

    “Just like politics, all population dynamics are local,” says ECSP’s Meaghan Parker. “Delving more deeply into national trends in West Africa or subnational differences between states in India, for example, will quickly reveal that some parts of the world are inarguably facing a population-resource challenge. Meanwhile, Japan is clearly also facing an aging issue. Understanding how these different growth trends interact with the environment requires a more nuanced conversation than we generally have.”

    Sources: The New York Times, Retro Report, UN Population Division.

    Video Credit: “The Population Bomb?” courtesy of Retro Report via The New York Times.

    Topics: Africa, aging, Asia, demography, environment, Europe, Eye On, family planning, featured, gender, global health, Latin America, media, Middle East, On the Beat, population, video

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • Ocean Fish Stocks on “Verge of Collapse,” Says IRIN Report Ocean Fish Stocks on “Verge of Collapse,” Says IRIN Report
    Kevin: I am an evangelical who disagrees with the Bible Thumpers/Literalists. The good news is that these...
  • Sophia Heat Pregnancy Photo High Temperatures Threaten Maternal and Newborn Health–Climate Change Policy Must Adjust
    Maya: Wow! Very informative!
  • A,Port,Las,Palmas,De,Gran,Canaria.,Canary,Islands,,Spain. China Leads the Race to the Bottom: Deep Sea Mining for Critical Minerals
    Jo-jo: Very Objective and I am surprised that circular economy is one of the factors to taking into account

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000