• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • Friday Podcasts

    Nat Geo’s Dennis Dimick on the Food-Water-Energy Nexus, Coal, and the Year Ahead

    February 21, 2014 By Paris Achenbach
    dennis-dimick

    How clean can coal be? What is the future of food security in water-deprived regions, and how will that affect national security? Dennis Dimick, National Geographic Magazine’s executive editor for the environment, discusses some of the most pressing global environmental problems in this week’s podcast.

    How clean can coal be? What is the future of food security in water-deprived regions, and how will that affect national security? Dennis Dimick, National Geographic Magazine’s executive editor for the environment, discusses some of the most pressing global environmental problems in this week’s podcast.

    “If you look back to Tunisia, the catalyst for disruption was the price of food,” says Dimick. “In 2008 in Mexico, the riots were over the price of corn. That’s all a direct downstream result of: Was there rain? Could the crops be harvested? Was the harvest that came off the land available and an affordable price?”

    The interaction between agriculture and water is a global phenomenon. Maps from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s GRACE satellite, show “shocking” soil moisture deficits, he says:

    As there’s rising pressure on water supplies, you have competing demands. There’s this energy-food-water nexus that occurs… In Texas, [for example], there’s very little surface water, so you’re mining fossil water that will run out eventually…to get cheap energy. That may help you in the near-term, but you’re setting up the program for essentially desertification and abandonment in future decades.

    This food-water-energy nexus is an issue that “needs to be addressed and is not necessarily being included in the narrative right now,” according to Dimick.

    Perhaps the biggest issues incarnation of this nexus is the concept of “clean coal.” “It is technologically feasible,” he says of carbon capture but the question is, “is it economically sustainable?” Since the turn of the century, coal has grown faster as a primary energy source for the global economy “than virtually all other energy sources combined.” But coal-burning power plants remain one of the leading contributors of greenhouse gas emissions and are extremely water intensive.

    Further, “when you build pipelines, when you build coal plants…you’ve made huge capital investments for decades,” Dimick says. “And that sets an energy path for you…[tying] yourself more to oil or other carbon sources…foreclosing or precluding choices that you might have made otherwise in investing in other kinds of non-carbon emission energy.”

    Dennis Dimick spoke at the Wilson Center on January 24 about the biggest environmental headlines in the year ahead at an event co-sponsored by the Society of Environmental Journalists.

    Friday podcasts are also available for download on iTunes.

    Topics: agriculture, climate change, coal, consumption, development, energy, environment, food security, Friday Podcasts, media, Mexico, natural resources, podcast, security, Tunisia, U.S., water
    • Steven Earl Salmony

      Is it not science, and science alone, that allows us to confirm our perceptions as objective correlates of reality and truth? Without science, thought leaders and power brokers in cultures everywhere are free to transmit memes at will, regardless of the extent to which the memes bear a meaningful relationship to what could be real and true. For example, a preternatural factoid or meme like “food must be produced in order to meet the needs of a growing population” is falsely given credence as a scientific idea although it reflects the opposite of the actual relationship between food supply and human numbers. Findings from science indicate population numbers are the dependent variable and food the independent variable, just like the population dynamics of other species. By increasing the food supply, we are in fact growing the human population, are we not? That human exceptionalism applies to its population dynamics and therefore is essentially different from (not similar to) the population dynamics of other species is a pseudoscientific factoid, bereft of an adequate foundation in science. Overwhelming science regarding the human population indicates that human population numbers appear as a function of food supply. For many this scientific idea is on the one hand irrefutable and on the other hand unbelievable. So completely are we enthralled by the notion of human exceptionalism. Exploding human numbers are the natural result of the Industrial and later Green Revolutions, are they not?

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • 49890944808_c7d6dfef74_c Why Feminism Is Good for Your Health
    Melinda Cadwallader: "Feminism materializes through investment in human capital and caregiving sectors of the economy...
  • 49890944808_c7d6dfef74_c Why Feminism Is Good for Your Health
    Melinda Cadwallader: People who refuse to acknowledge patriarchy are often the ones who benefit from it. So please, say...
  • Water desalination pipes A Tale of Two Coastlines: Desalination in China and California
    Dr S Sundaramoorthy: It is all fine as theory. What about the energy cost? Arabian Gulf has the money from its own oil....

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000