• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • Friday Podcasts

    From Malthus to Ehrlich and Beyond: William Pan on the Roots of PHE

    October 18, 2013 By Jacob Glass
    william-pan-blog

    More than four decades ago, Paul Ehrlich and John Holdren said complacency concerning the impact of human population growth is “unjustified and counterproductive.” More than 200 years ago, Thomas Malthus made the case that “the way we have to reduce the birth rate is family planning and delaying marriage, [thus] expanding the number of years between births,” says Duke University’s William Pan in this week’s podcast.

    More than four decades ago, Paul Ehrlich and John Holdren said complacency concerning the impact of human population growth is “unjustified and counterproductive.” More than 200 years ago, Thomas Malthus made the case that “the way we have to reduce the birth rate is family planning and delaying marriage, [thus] expanding the number of years between births,” says Duke University’s William Pan in this week’s podcast.

    Both, though controversial in some respects, are part of the historical arc of population, health, and environment (PHE) studies, Pan argues.

    “Everyone knows about Thomas Malthus. He’s the father of demography; he’s probably the father of PHE as well,” says Pan. Malthus is perhaps best known for his apocalyptic predictions of famine and disease, but Pan says his pioneering study of population-environment dynamics laid the groundwork for more nuanced and advanced scholarship today.

    Still, when it comes to population, “the investigation of synergistic effects is one of the most neglected areas of environmental research,” says Pan. “And that is still true today.”

    He suggests there is a disconnect between practitioners and academic scholars that needs to be addressed in order to further advance the field.

    Over the course of a series of seminars at Duke, on “where are the intersections that are most fruitful between academics, researchers, and implementers,” Pans says they concluded “we should be pushing forward with some more NGO-academic partnerships, either through increased training or some other kind of program that can start creating PHE degrees.” He pointed out as a positive example that Cornell is currently advertising for the very first “PHE faculty” appointment.

    He also recommended standardizing data collection methods to enable better PHE research across geographies and scales:

    When you collect data, we need to have minimum standards for how data are collected and how we define variables that we’re collecting, so that when you’re looking across sites – whether it’s in Africa or Latin America – you can collect a similar variable and hopefully it will mean the same thing, and if it doesn’t mean the same thing hopefully you’ll be able to figure out why it doesn’t mean the same thing.

    In many ways, the challenges of bringing together development practitioners working on PHE in the field on one hand, and academics studying these dynamics in the classroom on the other, mirror the exciting opportunities of the PHE model itself, which relies on innovative partnerships and interdisciplinary collaboration for success. But failing to bridge this gap blunts the momentum for expansion of the approach, Pan says.

    “To ignore population, health, and environment today because the problem is tough is to commit ourselves to even gloomier prospects 20 years hence, when the easiest synergies to reduce environment and health impacts will have been exhausted,” Pan says, paraphrasing Ehrlich and Holdren.

    “Almost word for word this is what they wrote in their paper in 1971, and it’s almost identical to what we should be saying today,” he concludes. “We have to act now.”

    Pan spoke at the Wilson Center on September 26. Download his slides to follow along.

    Friday podcasts are also available for download on iTunes. 

    Sources: Science.

    Topics: Africa, conservation, cooperation, demography, development, education, environment, family planning, Friday Podcasts, global health, Latin America, PHE, podcast, population
    • Boganis

      Kudos to William Pan and all of the academics pushing to create PHE study programs within their universities! The fact is that at some point in the future the earth’s governments will come to the uncomfortable realization that very sophisticated programs conforming each country’s population size to the carrying capacity of the geological territory will become necessary and researchers with PHE educations will be the front line in completing the compendium needed to embark on any such plan of action.

    • stevenearlsalmony

      The AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population was founded in 2001. Since that moment I have seen it as a moral imperative to continue the work I’ve been doing for many years now: getting the message out and explaining to as many people as possible that human overpopulation of the Earth is occurring on our watch, that it poses profound existential risks for future human well being, life as we know it and environmental health, and that robust action is required starting here, starting now to honestly acknowledge, humanely address and eventually overcome.

    • Leona D’Agnes

      I’m interested to learn more about the PHE faculty position at Cornell University. In which College is that? And has Cornell selected a candidate yet?

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • World Population Day Shines a Spotlight on Inequities
    george Denniston: When I was born in 1934, there were only 2 Billion people on earth. As I grew up, I watched it...
  • AGU_1959_photo1 Melting Ice Threatens to Expose Former U.S. Nuclear Base in Greenland
    Charles Diemont: And who is responsible for the cleanup of this debacle.? Ler the Americans clean up their own mess....
  • World Population Day Shines a Spotlight on Inequities
    Sam Sellers: Kathleen is quite right that World Population Day presents an important opportunity to reflect on...

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2022. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000