• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • New UNEP Report Explores Environment’s Links to Conflict, Peacebuilding

    March 10, 2009 By Will Rogers
    “Integrating environment and natural resources into peacebuilding is no longer an option—it is a security imperative,” says a new report from the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), From Conflict to Peacebuilding: The Role of Natural Resources and the Environment (to be launched by Achim Steiner, executive director of UNEP, at a March 24, 2009, event at the Wilson Center). A joint product of UNEP and UNEP’s Expert Advisory Group on Environment, Conflict and Peacebuilding, the report was co-authored by Richard Matthew of the University of California, Irvine, Oli Brown of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, and David Jensen of UNEP’s Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch. Though environmental conditions are rarely – if ever – the sole precipitator of violent conflict and war, they do play an important role as a “threat multiplier which exacerbates existing trends, tensions and instability” that can ultimately lead to conflict.

    Environmental factors can play a pivotal role along all points of the conflict continuum—from the outbreak of conflict, to the perpetuation of conflict, to the collapse of peace and return to violence. “Attempts to control natural resources or grievances caused by inequitable wealth sharing or environmental degradation can contribute to the outbreak of conflict,” the report says. In Darfur, for example, “water scarcity and the steady loss of fertile land are important underlying factors” that have combined with ethnic rivalry, human and livestock population growth, and weak governance to contribute to conflict.

    Exploitation of natural resources also played a substantial role in financing and sustaining conflicts in Sierra Leone, Liberia, Angola, and Cambodia, “transforming war and insurgency into an economic rather than purely political activity.” Economic incentives to control valuable natural resources can reinforce political fragmentation, derail a peace process, and even “undermine genuine political reintegration and reconciliation” after peace has been forged.

    Not only can natural resources help precipitate violence, conflict can also affect natural resources, destroying people’s livelihoods and perpetuating the conflict cycle. During conflict, the environment can be transformed into a weapon of war that can endanger human health and disrupt and destroy livelihoods—as when wells are poisoned or crops are burned, for example. Environmental destruction disrupts “normal socio-economic patterns,” forces “populations to adopt coping strategies, and often leads to internal displacement or migration to neighboring countries.” And conflict can erode or destroy state institutions and civil society, exacerbating grievances (or creating new ones) and furthering the resource exploitation that fuels the conflict.

    Successful peacebuilding therefore requires that “environmental drivers are managed, that tensions are defused, and that natural assets are used sustainably to support stability and development in the long term.” According to the report, successfully integrating natural resource and environmental issues into conflict prevention and peacebuilding strategies requires the United Nations and international community to:
    1. Improve the capacity for early warning and action “in countries that are vulnerable to conflict over natural resources;”

    2. Implement economic sanctions and develop new legal strategies to improve “oversight and protection of natural resources during conflicts” to minimize their use in financing and sustaining conflict;

    3. Address natural resource and environmental issues in the initial peacemaking and peacekeeping processes;

    4. Incorporate natural-resource and environmental issues into integrated peacebuilding strategies in order to avoid a relapse into conflict;

    5. Help countries use their natural resources to promote economic growth, while practicing good governance and environmental sustainability; and

    6. Promote confidence building and cooperation between conflicting groups that have shared interests over natural resources and the environment.
    Photo: Cover of UNEP’s “From Conflict to Peacebuilding: The Role of Natural Resources and the Environment,” featuring an image of Nigerian soldiers with the UN’s African Mission in Darfur patrolling a bombed village. Courtesy of Lynsey Addario/Corbis and the UN Environment Programme.
    Topics: climate change, conflict, cooperation, environment, environmental peacemaking, environmental security, military, natural resources, security
    • Anonymous

      I thought this was a very interesting article because it shows not only the connection between environmental stressors and how they can eventually lead to conflict, but also shows how conflict has an adverse affect on the environment. One thing I think is interesting is how when we look at places, specifically in Africa, we always associate conflict with small undeveloped countries. Now more than ever we have huge investments in Africa by Western Countries like the United States and Eastern countries like China. What concerns me is the potential for conflict in Africa based on competition for resources by the two superpowers. China has major investments and is competing for scarce resources in almost every country on the African Continent. Meanwhile the United States has recently created AFRICOM, a regional command for the military to increase US presence in the region. With so much Chinese interaction, and now a US military presence it seems that the potential for conflict seems inevitable. This does not necessarily mean an armed conflict by any means, but rather a standoff comparable to the Cold War. The biggest problem I see is that now with so much competition over resources in Africa, not just from the local but foreign countries as well, the biggest loser in the whole situation will be the people of those African countries that are having their already limited resources being sucked up by competing developed powers. Not only that but they will be dealing with all of these environmental issues while being stuck in a tug of war between China and the US. In the global scheme of things there seems to be a lot of focus on the potential conflict within undeveloped countries in Africa when there is an even bigger possibility of conflict between developed countries with Africa as the battleground.

    • http://www.blogger.com/profile/12871749575352820527 ECSP Staff

      Sharon Freeman has recently published an edited collection that contains the perspectives of 60 Chinese, African, and African Diaspora leaders who collectively share deep insights and “insider” information about the role, impact, and modis operandi of China in Africa: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/index.cfm?topic_id=1417&fuseaction;=topics.event_summary&event;_id=565243

    • http://www.blogger.com/profile/07430391562374233505 Meaghan Parker

      Steve McDonald, director of the Wilson Center's Africa Program, wrote a paper on how changes in U.S. policy on Africa in the new administration
      will impact AFRICOM:
      http://www.wilsoncenter.org/topics/docs/University%20%20of%20Pittsburg%20Presentation.doc

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • Rainforest destruction. Gold mining place in Guyana China’s Growing Environmental Footprint in the Caribbean
    ZingaZingaZingazoomzoom: US cleans up. China runs wild on free rein- A lack of international compliance mechanisms to hold...
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous souhaitons que le partenaire nous apporte son soutien technique et financier.
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous sommes une organisation féminine dénommée: Actions Communautaires pour le Développement de...

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000