• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • On the Beat

    Climate Engineering: Innovative Solution or Ethical Dilemma?

    December 11, 2017 By Julianne Liebenguth
    Weather Balloon

    “Climate engineering can be a way to build a better world,” said Katharine Mach, a senior research scientist at Stanford University during a recent virtual workshop on the promises and pitfalls of climate engineering held by the Institute on Science for Global Policy, in partnership with the Forum for Climate Geoengineering Assessment at American University, and the School of Sustainability at Arizona State University.

     “The warming from CO2 that we put into the atmosphere is nearly permanent. So any goal we set, like keeping warming to two degrees Celsius or below, has a carbon budget associated with it,” said Mach. Sometimes called geoengineering, proponents argue that climate engineering strategies “can effectively expand the remaining carbon budget, giving us more ability to ambitiously rein in our emissions of gasses through time and limit dangers of climate change,” she said.

    Carbon dioxide removal, for example, involves either capturing carbon dioxide immediately after combustion or directly “grabbing” it out of the atmosphere using chemical reactions. The goal is to ultimately compress and inject the carbon dioxide underground “where it can be stored nearly permanently in geological structures,” said Mach.

    Solar radiation management—reflecting sunlight away from earth—is another possible method of controlling the climate. Injecting aerosol droplets into the stratosphere or saltwater into clouds over the ocean could make them more reflective to sunlight, said Doug MacMartin, a senior research associate at Cornell University. “In principle, if you reflected some sunlight away, you could cool the planet and reduce some of the consequences [of] climate change,” said MacMartin.

    Although these technologies are still in the research and development phase, the prospects of climate engineering highlight pressing concerns about environmental ethics and governance. David Morrow, a fellow with the Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment at American University, argued that intergenerational impacts, as well as the fair distribution of benefits and risks, are potential ethical issues related to climate engineering. It is important to pay close attention to “the processes by which decisions get made connected to the development or deployment or non-deployment of geoengineering,” said Morrow.

    There is also a controversial debate as to whether climate engineering “is giving polluters permission to pollute,” said Ariel Anbar, a professor at Arizona State University. Applying a technological fix to climate change could “weaken people’s resolve about doing the hard work of cutting back on emissions.”

    Read More:

    • Climate engineering is on the table “because the situation is getting pretty desperate,” argues Simon Nicholson in a podcast on its potential unintended consequences.
    • How we talk about ocean iron fertilization is driving opposition to it.
    • The checkered history of weather control goes back farther than you think.

    Sources: Forum for Climate Geoengineering Assessment, Global Environmental Change, Institute on Science for Global Policy, Oxford Geoengineering Programme, School of Sustainability Arizona State University, Stanford School of Earth Energy and Environmental Sciences, The New York Times

    Photo Credit: Stratospheric research balloon, courtesy of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

    Topics: climate change, climate engineering, democracy and governance, featured, foreign policy, international environmental governance, On the Beat

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous souhaitons que le partenaire nous apporte son soutien technique et financier.
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous sommes une organisation féminine dénommée: Actions Communautaires pour le Développement de...
  • hongqiao-liu1 As China Adjusts for “True Cost” of Rare Earths, What Does It Mean for Decarbonization?
    Anthony Maw: It is just another one of those "inconvenient truths". Western defense and security analysts often...

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000