• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • Reading Radar

    Is Food Aid Helpful or Harmful in Conflict-Affected Areas?

    October 8, 2014 By Moses Jackson

    AERFood aid is one of the most common humanitarian interventions, but it has come under increasing scrutiny from some observers who charge it may not be an effective means of addressing food security and may actually make matters worse. Two recent studies examine the relationship between food aid and conflict, shedding light on both sides of an ongoing debate.

    AERA study published in the American Economic Review offers macro-level quantitative support for critics’ claims that food aid, which is often prone to theft or capture by armed groups, can undermine its own objectives by sparking or fueling violence – particularly in places with a history of recent conflict, like Somalia and Afghanistan. Co-authors Nathan Nunn and Nancy Qian of Harvard and Yale, respectively, examine factors related to U.S. wheat production, which comprises the lion’s share of food aid globally, and the onset and duration of intra- and inter-state armed conflict in 125 countries over 36 years. They address a number of possible alternative explanations and confounding factors and conclude that increases in U.S. food aid tend to prolong civil conflicts already underway. They do not, however, find strong evidence linking food aid to conflicts between states or the onset of new conflicts.

    TusiimeOn the other hand, a study published in Food Policy finds that food aid provides critical support for vulnerable populations affected by conflict. Drawing on 1,265 observations from a 2008 survey, co-authors Hamidu Tusiime, Robrecht Renard, and Lodewijk Smets investigate the impacts of food aid on household food security during a conflict in northern Uganda. Their analysis suggests food aid successfully targeted those in need and reduced household food expenditures by as much as 35 percent. The program also prevented families from having to sell valuable assets, like livestock, and decreased their propensity to skip meals and eat less. However, these benefits accrued primarily to male-headed households, and the authors recommend addressing this imbalance in future efforts.

    Sources: American Economic Review, Food Policy.

    Topics: Afghanistan, Africa, conflict, development, economics, Feed the Future, food security, foreign policy, gender, humanitarian, livelihoods, nutrition, Reading Radar, security, Somalia, U.S., Uganda
    • https://www.newsecuritybeat.org/ Schuyler Null

      USAID responded to Nunn and Qian’s article here: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00K5P8.pdf

    • Molly McGraw

      The conflict over the food aid is a result of the armed/conflict groups, not the food itself. The aid may be causing more conflict but it is also serving a critical purpose. So how do we get these accrued benefits to the females and children within the household and not just the males? Perhaps a food aid intervention targeting women could be implemented, outside of the household, and in a secure location.

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • 49890944808_c7d6dfef74_c Why Feminism Is Good for Your Health
    Melinda Cadwallader: "Feminism materializes through investment in human capital and caregiving sectors of the economy...
  • 49890944808_c7d6dfef74_c Why Feminism Is Good for Your Health
    Melinda Cadwallader: People who refuse to acknowledge patriarchy are often the ones who benefit from it. So please, say...
  • Water desalination pipes A Tale of Two Coastlines: Desalination in China and California
    Dr S Sundaramoorthy: It is all fine as theory. What about the energy cost? Arabian Gulf has the money from its own oil....

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000