• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • rss
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • Historic Floods Plague Pakistan

    August 19, 2010 By Shawna Cuan

    “Staggered by the scale of destruction from this summer’s catastrophic floods, Pakistani officials have begun to acknowledge that the country’s security could be gravely affected,” reports the Washington Post. The Pakistani government – already cash-strapped between fighting “the war on terror” and trying to prevent an economic collapse – now faces recovering from the worst flooding in over 80 years.

    Security Implications of Slow International Relief Efforts

    Aid and relief have been scarce. According to the United Nations, not even a third of the estimated $459 million needed has been met. So far, the United States ranks as the largest contributor, at $71 million. Individual donors, Islamic charities, the Pakistani military, and the United States have been the most prominent actors in relief efforts so far.

    The lack of international aid has become a major concern. As Ahmed Rashid wrote recently in The New York Review of Books, aid is needed immediately, for rebuilding bridges, restoring power, and reopening roads, particularly in the Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa province – a haven for Pakistani and Afghan insurgents.

    Islamic charities have partially filled the void, providing substantial aid in some of the worst affected regions. “The patchy government response has given room for Islamist groups, some allegedly linked to militant outfits, to step in and offer their own aid to displaced and hungry flood victims,” reports the Associated Press.

    Varied Government Responses

    The Pakistani military has been just about the only competent component of state-run relief efforts. Tens of thousands of soldiers have been dispatched to assist in rescue operations. Already, 75,000 stranded people have been rescued, although rescue attempts have been heavily restricted due to challenging terrain.

    The relatively weak government response – notably a lack of presence from the civilian side – has only further undermined its legitimacy in the eyes of ordinary Pakistanis, who have faced government incompetence before. “There is no silver lining, just misery for many,” concludes Bruce Riedel, a counterterrorism expert and senior fellow at the Brookings Institute.

    The U.S., for its part, has dispatched helicopters to assist in the rescue operations and have managed to rescue 3,089 people and drop 322,340 pounds of emergency relief supplies so far. The United States has also allocated $3 million for 15 waterborne illness treatment centers.

    A New Opening for Pakistani Insurgents

    Existing concerns over Pakistan’s fragility as a state have been compounded by the unfolding disaster. Ahmed Rashid warns that “unless the international community takes immediate action to provide major emergency aid and support, the country risks turning into what until now has remained only a grim but remote possibility—a failed state with nuclear weapons.”

    Redirecting 60,000 of Pakistan’s 500,000 troops to assist in rescue operations has constrained the army in its fight against insurgents. Although extremists were expelled in a major military operation a year ago, the floods in the Swat Valley have overturned bridges, removed hundreds of miles of electricity pylons and gas lines, and destroyed nearly 50 percent of the valley’s livestock and standing crops, creating fears of a possible resurgence in violence.

    “There is now a lot of breathing space for the Pakistani Taliban and their allies in the tribal areas,” Hasan-Askari Rizvi, a political and defense analyst, told the Washington Post. “They know they will soon be able to cash in on the ammunition that develops as the people are alienated from the government.”

    The Specter of Food Shortages

    Food security concerns have been heightened by the devastation in the Sindh and Punjab provinces, which provide a critical component of Pakistan’s food supply and economy. Already, in central Punjab province alone, “1.5 million hectares of valuable farmland [has been] destroyed,” according to Dawn. Meanwhile, according to Punjab Governor Salmaan Taseer, “a total of $2-3 billion worth of crops had been destroyed in the province including 650,000 acres of cotton and rice, maize and other cash crops.”

    While worsened by the crisis, “food security in Pakistan has been under constant threat during the last few years,” according to a report by the Wilson Center’s Asia Program, “Hunger Pains: Pakistan’s Food Insecurity.” The report points out that in 2008 nearly half the country’s population – 77 million out of 168 million people – was going hungry, up 28 percent from March 2007. Of Pakistan’s 121 districts, 95 were suffering from hunger and malnutrition-related disease.

    The full effect of the flooding has yet to be determined, but the situation has certainly become even more grim. “With the chronic shortage of foodstuffs and the beginning of the fasting month of Ramadan,” writes Rashid, “food prices have already doubled, raising the prospect of social tensions and even food riots.” Given that the country was beset by debilitating food-security issues prior to the flooding, how or when Pakistan will recover from this disaster remains unclear.

    Shawna Cuan is a former intern for Woodrow Wilson Center scholar Maria Ivanova. 

    Sources: Associated Press, BBC, DAWN, Guardian, New York Review of Books, New York Times, Reuters, U.S. State Department, United Nations, Washington Post.

    Photo Credit: “Flooding in Punjab Province, Pakistan,” courtesy of flickr user United Nations Photo.

    Topics: agriculture, conflict, disaster relief, environment, flooding, food security, foreign policy, livelihoods, military, Pakistan, security, South Asia, water
    • http://www.blogger.com/profile/18337694112852162181 Geoff Dabelko

      Aggregation of resources for mapping the Pakistani floods available from the Dutch hydrology portal – http://www.hydrology.nl/mainnews/1-latest-news/214-mapping-pakistan-floods.html

    • http://www.blogger.com/profile/11725882565939618412 AjC

      There was an article posted on Yahoo news the day before this post was written called Insurgents, Police clash amid Pakistan flooding. The article discusses Islamic militants attacking police posts in the northwest region of Pakistan. It is also pointed out that Pakistani Taliban are urging citizens to reject foreign aid under the pretence that it will only be "stolen" by the people in positions of power to do so. The question I ask is: does anyone see this becoming a major issue and how do we deal with the reestablishment of the Taliban and al-Qaida in Pakistan? Is there any new developments on this front, and where do we stand on this issue?

      the article can be found at:
      http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100818/ap_on_re_as/as_pakistan_floods_189

    • http://www.blogger.com/profile/18337694112852162181 Geoff Dabelko

      The potential for governments to lose legitimacy and credibility in the eyes of the populace in the face of major natural disasters is a problem with an established history. It suggests that the floods are a major opportunity for anti-government forces to gain support by fulfilling roles that state is expected to but fails to fill. So yes, big concern and hence the urgency of of outside players to provide aid and willingness of the U.S. military among others to divert assets to help provide this assistance.

    • http://www.blogger.com/profile/00412194977809534429 Sajid Anwar

      Wonderful post!

      I've been here in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa for the last week delivering aid and conducting assessments with the Pakistan Red Crescent, mostly in Nowshera, Charsada, and the surrounding villages. Before the floods, most of the people here said they didn't receive much, if any, government help. So in their eyes, the government likely lost legitimacy a long time ago. They also haven't encountered any Islamic charity groups. The biggest presence in KPK, one of the worst affected areas, are local non-political NGOs and UNICEF/UNHCR.

      The villages I visited that have seen government aid after the flood are mostly located on land belonging to a member of either the national or provincial assemblies. Long story short, those who did expect government help seem to be getting it.

      On the other hand, I feel the military is aware of the opportunity those anti-govt forces have to gain support, and has stepped up its aid operations significantly. They're delivering aid directly, and they've partnered with many of the NGOs working in the area, giving them a very visible presence.

      The frustration and tension is palpable in these villages, but I think that is more the result of empty stomachs and destroyed homes than the lack of a government presence that wasn't expected to begin with.

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • Pakistan-fertility-estimate Pakistan’s Population Bomb Defused?
    muhammad rehman: High infant mortality , low life span and immigration should also be taken into account. A TFR of...
  • Water desalination pipes A Tale of Two Coastlines: Desalination in China and California
    RILEY PELFREY: Why can`t they use nuclear ?
  • 3743285915_7b4099efdb_o Managing the Mekong: Conflict or Compromise?
    Big Poppy!: Thank you so much! 😊🎉🎊

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2022. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000