• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • Reading Radar

    Planning to Move: Relocating Coastal Communities in the United States

    July 24, 2017 By Antony Martel

    Reaching-Higher-GroundSea-level rise will put approximately 13 million coastal Americans at risk of displacement by 2100, but the first to move will be the most vulnerable communities. In Reaching Higher Ground: Avenues to Secure and Manage New Land for Communities Displaced by Climate Change, Wilson Center Global Fellow Maxine Burkett and her coauthors look at Native American communities on the frontlines of climate change as a model for how vulnerable coastal communities can successfully relocate. Currently, there is no central mechanism within the federal government for relocating communities displaced by climate change. Federally recognized Native American communities have historically coexisted alongside the United States government as sovereign entities, and their many avenues – legal, policy, and corporate – to acquire land could provide a starting point for addressing this imminent challenge. The authors identify tools communities can use to secure new homes and preserve their ownership of evacuated lands.

    Migration-induced-by-sea-leCurrent discussions of sea-level rise characterize it as a coastal issue, which underplays its potential impacts on land-locked communities. Mathew E. Hauer examines the social implications of sea-level rise in his Nature article, “Migration induced by sea-level rise could reshape the U.S. population landscape.” Hauer finds that 56 percent of U.S. counties could be affected by intra- and inter-state migration associated with a 1.8 meter sea-level rise. Adaptation measures, such as “sea walls, beach and marsh nourishment, pumps, or elevat[ing] homes and roads to protect both people and property” could mitigate the volume of migration. However, according to Hauer’s theoretical framework, only individuals earning more than US $100,000 per year could use these methods to mitigate climate-related effects on their homes—which is only the top quartile of the U.S. population living in vulnerable coastal communities. Therefore, inland communities “could see tens of thousands of SLR [sea-level rise] in-migrants, and many coastal communities could lose tens of thousands of migrants.” This report emphasizes “the importance of accounting for future migrations associated with climate change in long-range planning processes” across the country, not just along the coasts.

    Sources: Center for Progressive Reform, Nature

    Topics: adaptation, climate change, environment, migration, Reading Radar, U.S.
    • Lois Saxton

      I live in a community that is located below sea level, on the Pacific Coast. There are plans for relocating our village to “up the hill”, but it may be years before it happens. due to lack of funding. Our schools and day care and senior housing are all located in the “lower village”. Winter storms have been breaching our sea wall. The village is Taholah, WA, and it is on the Quinault Reservation, on the Olympic Peninsula. Nobody seems very much concerned about it, although another winter approaches.

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • 49890944808_c7d6dfef74_c Why Feminism Is Good for Your Health
    Melinda Cadwallader: "Feminism materializes through investment in human capital and caregiving sectors of the economy...
  • 49890944808_c7d6dfef74_c Why Feminism Is Good for Your Health
    Melinda Cadwallader: People who refuse to acknowledge patriarchy are often the ones who benefit from it. So please, say...
  • Water desalination pipes A Tale of Two Coastlines: Desalination in China and California
    Dr S Sundaramoorthy: It is all fine as theory. What about the energy cost? Arabian Gulf has the money from its own oil....

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000