• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • The Making of a Tragedy: Inequality, Mistrust, Environmental Change Drive Ebola Epidemic

    October 9, 2014 By Laurie Mazur
    ebola

    In August, armed men stormed an Ebola clinic in Monrovia, Liberia, releasing infected patients and stealing contaminated bedding. The following month, eight health workers were attacked and killed in a Guinean village as they tried to educate residents about the deadly disease; their bodies were found in a village latrine. Days later, Red Cross workers in western Guinea were assaulted as they tried to collect and bury Ebola victims.

    The emergence and spread of the virus raises warnings that must be heard worldwide

    Why? Gripped by fear and rage, the attackers either denied the presence of Ebola, or blamed health workers for intentionally spreading the disease.

    These incidents underscore the extraordinary challenge of containing the Ebola epidemic, a metastasizing global health tragedy that could afflict up to 1.4 million people in West Africa by January. The emergence and spread of the virus raises warnings that must be heard worldwide.

    It speaks powerfully of the risks posed by poverty, environmental degradation, and weak health systems, and of the need to bolster our collective resilience to epidemics and other disasters. And it illustrates the crucial role of trust in public institutions – government, health care systems, multilateral organizations.

    Indeed, trust is an intangible social good that is perhaps best appreciated in its absence. It is especially elusive in times of crisis, when it is unfortunately needed most.

    New Vectors

    Months before the Ebola epidemic spiraled out of control, there was Patient Zero, a not-quite-two-year-old girl in Guinea. She likely contracted the virus from an infected bat, in an impoverished village where bushmeat is a dietary staple. Because Ebola so often afflicts caregivers, the child’s pregnant mother was soon infected, then other family members, then the midwife who nursed the mother through a miscarriage. Within months, the virus had arrived in the capital, Conakry, and seeded even larger epidemics in neighboring Liberia and Sierra Leone.

    “As the forests disappeared, so too did the buffer separating humans from animals”

    But the origins of the epidemic reach back further still. The virus may have been flushed out of the forest by multinational timber and mining operations that have clear-cut the (now misnamed) Guinea Forest Region, where the child was from. And population growth, partly driven by refugees from the brutal civil wars in Liberia and Sierra Leone, has driven settlements deeper into the remaining bush.

    “As the forests disappeared,” writes Jeffrey Stern in Vanity Fair, “so too did the buffer separating humans from animals – and from the pathogens that animals harbor.” Zoonotic diseases like Ebola are on the rise worldwide, as habitat loss accelerates.

    Climate change may have also played a role. A 2002 study found that abrupt shifts from dry to wet conditions are associated with Ebola outbreaks in Africa – and climate change is making those shifts more likely. West Africa is already reeling from climate impacts: Sierra Leone, for example, is coping with “seasonal droughts, strong winds, thunderstorms, landslides, heat waves, floods, and changed rainfall patterns,” according to the International Food Policy Research Institute.

    ebola_cell

    1 Nation, 200 Doctors

    Environmental change may have contributed to the emergence of the disease, but poverty and social dysfunction made it an epidemic.

    “Large hemorrhagic fever virus outbreaks almost invariably occur in areas in which the economy and public health system have been decimated from years of civil conflict or failed development,” write Daniel G. Bausch and Lara Schwarz in the PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases journal.

    “[The Ebola epidemic] shows the deadly cost of unequal access to basic services and the consequences of our failure to fix this problem”

    This is sadly true of the affected countries in West Africa. Liberia and Sierra Leone are still struggling to repair societies and economies devastated by war. Guinea, hobbled by decades of corrupt, authoritarian government, ranks 179 out of 187 countries on the UNDP Human Development Index, just behind Liberia (175) and above Sierra Leone (183).

    In these impoverished nations, health care systems were completely inadequate before the Ebola outbreak. Liberia – a nation of four million – had fewer than 200 doctors. As the epidemic took off, health systems were quickly overwhelmed, turning away patients to be cared for by family and friends, who frequently became infected.

    Hospitals in the region lack basic infection-control essentials like running water and protective gowns and gloves, so doctors and nurses catch the virus from their patients and pass it on.

    As World Bank President Jim Yong Kim declared in early October, “[the Ebola epidemic] shows the deadly cost of unequal access to basic services and the consequences of our failure to fix this problem.”

    Crowded Cities, Suspect Authorities

    Urbanization has also shaped the trajectory of the epidemic.

    Previous Ebola outbreaks took place in remote villages, where quarantines effectively contained the disease. But the last two decades have seen unprecedented migration to cities in Africa. As a result, the current epidemic is unspooling in urban slums with inadequate sanitation – ideal conditions for the transmission of disease.

    As Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota told NPR earlier this month, “the virus hasn’t changed, Africa has changed. We now have this virus in an urbanized population among people who travel far and wide.”

     “The virus hasn’t changed, Africa has changed”

    Still, the epidemic might have been contained in its early stages, if not for widespread distrust in public institutions. The proven tools of disease control (case reporting, quarantine, contact tracing) rely heavily on the trust and cooperation of affected communities. Without trust, even the best-intentioned, well-resourced public health efforts will falter.

    The roots of distrust run deep, and they can be difficult to untangle. Research shows that recent traumatic experiences and a history of oppression – perhaps not surprisingly – erode trust. Inequality also profoundly weakens the bonds of reciprocity that hold societies together. And, in times of crisis, societies predictably cleave along religious and ethnic lines.

    All of these dynamics are at play in the West African Ebola epidemic, where the trauma of recent conflict remains fresh and the legacy of oppression – from slavery, colonialism, and other forms of exploitation – is inescapable. The divide-and-conquer tactics of colonial powers ignited ethnic conflicts that still simmer today.

    Against that backdrop, it is easier to understand the response to those working to stem the epidemic in West Africa. Terrified of moon-suited health workers, wary of dysfunctional hospitals, families hid their sick and their dead. As Stern observes, again in Vanity Fair:

    It’s very likely we would not be where we are today had there not been large population pockets that were not cooperating with authorities, and in some cases violently resisting them. Infected people hiding allowed the virus to spread unseen.

    Lessons on Resilience

    The West African Ebola epidemic is a singular tragedy, a perfect storm of environmental and social factors that converged to ignite the largest outbreak yet of one of the world’s most deadly viruses.

    But the conditions that aided Ebola’s emergence and spread – poverty, environmental degradation, weak health systems, mistrust in public institutions – are certainly not confined to West Africa.

    The conditions that aided Ebola’s spread are not confined to West Africa

    There are lessons here for the development community, and for those seeking to build resilience in a turbulent world. Ebola illuminates the devastating toll of poverty and stalled development. It underscores the importance of intact ecosystems and the need to mitigate climate change. It demands immediate attention to the infrastructure of public health, including sanitation and primary care. It calls for new efforts to repair broken trust – by redressing historic injustices, by healing ethnic tensions, and by promoting broad-based development that reduces inequality.

    The question of trust – how it is built, why it fails – is of urgent relevance everywhere disasters occur, from Monrovia to the Lower Ninth Ward. It is a question that deserves more attention as we seek to cultivate resilience to the shocks and surprises of the future. But this much is clear: trust is essential, and it can’t be compelled. It must be earned.

    Laurie Mazur is a consultant on population and the environment for the Wilson Center’s Environmental Change and Security Program and a writer and consultant to non-profit organizations. She is the editor, most recently, of A Pivotal Moment: Population, Justice, and the Environmental Challenge.

    Sources: African Development Bank Group, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Associated Press, Beyond Intractability, Biosecurity and Bioterrorism, CBS News, Foreign Policy, International Food Policy Research Institute, NPR, National Bureau of Economic Research, The New York Times, PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Reuters, Stiglitz (2013), U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, UN Development Program, Vanity Fair, The Washington Post.

    Photo Credit: Morgana Wingard/USAID; Ebola virus particles, courtesy of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

    Topics: Africa, climate change, development, disaster relief, environment, featured, forests, global health, Guinea, Liberia, migration, poverty, risk and resilience, sanitation, Sierra Leone, urbanization
    • dujaa74

      Yep…America is screwed….. “The question of trust” not after #NDAA

    • Tim

      I think the conversation about trust and social capital is the most important part of this excellent post. Conflict and disasters, whether health-related or “natural,” inevitably undermine social capital. Conversely, restoring and building up this social capital is absolutely essential for post-conflict peacebuilding and disaster risk reduction (and, by extension, climate change adaptation). I’ve found this connection clear in my own research. While social capital is far from the only common theme between peacebuilding and DRR, it is perhaps the most central. That is why we cannot afford to ignore efforts to prepare for such crises in conflict-affected states. Rather than deferring resources from the pressing challenges at hand, finding ways to invest in win-win interventions that build up resilience to crises actually enhances peacebuilding efforts.

    • Jamie

      This is an excellent political ecology analysis of the Ebola crisis. Echoing Tim’s post, I find that social capital is indeed an important consideration during times of crisis. However, I have to disagree somewhat with the statement that disasters inevitably undermine social capital; rather, individuals who have high levels of social capital draw upon it in order to effectively respond to and recover from disasters. While this is not universally the case with many individuals (e.g., pre-disaster homeless individuals), social capital can be heightened and undermines during crisis events.

      Shifting gears a bit, understanding the spread of Ebola involves a socio-environmental analysis such as this that takes into consideration the effects of culture and political climate. I believe that the author did an excellent job of summarizing the multitude of factors that must be taken into consideration to understand why and how the virus spread. The disconnect in the public’s understanding between the political, environmental, and socioeconomic factors that provided the backdrop for the spread of Ebola is concerning–and this disconnect is concerning in other contexts as well (e.g., climate-induced migration, differential effects of disasters). I’m concerned about future “policy interventions” that may not take such factors into account, which have the potential to result in ineffective, and perhaps harmful, outcomes.

    • Kristin Parrish

      In light of all the recent Ebola news in the United States,
      I found this to be an interesting article. It is good to be informed of the
      environmental connection with this, as it is not a factor you hear discussed in
      the media. It is surprising to me that even a topic so centered on health would
      also have an environmental cause – due to the clearcutting of forests, more
      animals carrying the disease became exposed to humans. It is amazing how much
      this makes sense, and equally amazing to think about how if this environmental
      degradation had not occurred then this disease may not be as large of a problem
      as it currently is. Additionally, this article’s mention of the role of climate
      change was also quite surprising – It is no secret that climate change is
      occurring, but thinking of this phenomenon within the context of the spread of
      deadly diseases is eye-opening. The dangerous effects of climate change such as
      abrupt shifts from dry to wet conditions, associated droughts and floods, and
      stronger weather conditions such as winds and storms have negative impacts within
      themselves, but when combined with dangerous diseases make it even harder for
      those affected to cope or get the proper care they need. On the security side
      of the spectrum, it makes sense that those areas suffering from insecurity are
      the areas most likely to facilitate the spread of this disease. Places
      suffering from poverty, are war-torn, or under corrupt governments are more
      likely to have unsanitary practices or unequal access to basic services. I was
      especially surprised to read about the places in which Ebola was being used as
      a weapon as well – a sure sign that unstable areas are struggling to organize
      efforts for combating this widespread infection.

      Ultimately, the Ebola outbreak represents the need for trust
      and cooperation, with multiple entities working together to solve larger
      problems. It is proven that no insecure community can fight this alone, so aid
      must come from those who are knowledgeable and wealthy in resources, but
      equally as important, this aid must be accepted. This is exactly the lesson our
      world needs, regardless of what problem, especially when it comes to issues of
      health and in the environment. If a problem has the ability to affect all
      citizens of the world, only through mutual cooperation can come the ability for
      the problem to be solved.

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • Rainforest destruction. Gold mining place in Guyana China’s Growing Environmental Footprint in the Caribbean
    ZingaZingaZingazoomzoom: US cleans up. China runs wild on free rein- A lack of international compliance mechanisms to hold...
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous souhaitons que le partenaire nous apporte son soutien technique et financier.
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous sommes une organisation féminine dénommée: Actions Communautaires pour le Développement de...

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000