Don's reminder that the field-based folks don't get hung up on the names and instead adopt more inclusive and more integrated terms is something donors, implementers, and the larger network should keep in mind.  Too often too much energy is spent on the labels, too many times they are proxies for keeping one of the sectors out front and prominent, and too often they reflect outside rather than the diversity of local priorities.  Catchy titles that make clear the focus are always useful.  But if the point is there are a diversity of needs and responses need to help address those needs, then it is by definition going to be something less than catchy or at least very inclusive with a wider frame.