• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • No Peace Without Women

    November 11, 2010 By Kayly Ober
    un_women

    On October 31, 2000, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1325, which calls for women’s equal participation in all efforts to maintain and promote peace and security. The resolution sought to exorcise the demons of the 1990s, when genocide took over 800,000 lives in Rwanda, thousands of women were raped in Bosnia, and millions more were displaced. However, the truth is that little progress has been made over these last 10 years and women remain on the periphery when it comes to post-conflict reconstruction and development.

    A new report from the humanitarian organization CARE concedes that “much of the action remains declarative rather than operational.”

    According to the report, “From Resolution to Reality: Lessons learned from Afghanistan, Nepal and Uganda on women’s participation in peacebuilding and post-conflict governance,” despite small gains in female representation in the peace processes in Afghanistan, Uganda, and Nepal, SCR 1325 has had limited success because:

    • Participation is often superficial and events-based, rather than feeding into the nuts-and-bolts of designing peace operations and mediation efforts;
    • Efforts to empower women at the decision-making level have traditionally targeted urban elites, creating a national-local divide, which marginalizes rural women;
    • Participation is limited by short-term funding, which often focuses on basic life-saving assistance. Long-term funding tends to emphasize state-building through multi-donor trust funds and general budgetary support instead of more impactful grassroots projects;
    • An increased risk of violence against women in conflict-afflicted zones severely impedes women’s mobility and ability to participate;
    • National leadership lags because political leaders often lack the resources, capabilities, and/or political will to commit to pro-women policies. Cultural resistance to women’s rights among large segments of the population also weighs heavily on political calculations.

    A Woman’s Worth

    Although women’s participation at the local level lags, the UN has been particularly cognizant of the way SCR 1325 plays into its peacekeeping operations. In 2009, the UN launched an initiative to increase women’s participation in peacekeeping operations to 20 percent by 2014.

    According to The New York Times, women peacekeepers “employ distinctive social skills in a rugged macho domain. They are…counted on to bring calm to the streets and the barracks, acting as public servants instead of invaders.”

    Women peacekeepers also often provide a safe haven for victims of gender-based violence to turn to and they participate in more development-based projects like separating bathroom facilities for boys and girls in schools, and organizing baking courses to support women’s incorporation in the labor market.

    Setting Sights

    While small steps have been made internationally, we need to set our sights at the local, grassroots level. Indeed, more funding for long-term, integrated, multi-sectoral strategies to embed women’s participation and peacebuilding into wider, community-based transitional programs is essential.

    With integration in mind, perhaps improved attention to gender in peacekeeping operations will go hand-in-hand with increased attention to natural resource management issues, which Ban Ki-moon pushed the Security Council for this summer. Such a broadening of the UN’s peacekeeping envelope could pay dividends in places like the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where the UN’s largest peacekeeping operation ever has faced increasing criticism for repeatedly failing to protect women from rape in the eastern provinces and also failing to account for the valuable minerals that support the rebels.

    Women are often not allowed the space or time to participate in decision-making, but providing access to basic education, health services, and economic opportunity helps widen avenues towards meaningful participation in community and national affairs as well as empowers women to engage in a more holistic way.

    As CARE eloquently confirms, “without multi-sectoral and holistic approaches, women acquire neither the means, nor the confidence, nor the necessary community acceptance to voice their concerns and input to the peace process.”

    Sources: CARE, IPS News, Guardian, The New York Times, UN.

    Image Credit: “A female member of the Ethiopian battalion of the United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) joins the military observers in a parade to receive the medals in recognition of their contribution to the mission,” courtesy of flickr user United Nations Photo.

    Topics: Africa, conflict, foreign policy, gender, military, PHE, security, UN
    • http://womanstats.org Valerie M. Hudson

      Well done! Yes, there is certainly "no peace without women"! I would argue that there is not only a general R2P, but also an R2PW — a global responsibility to see that women are provided protection.

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous souhaitons que le partenaire nous apporte son soutien technique et financier.
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous sommes une organisation féminine dénommée: Actions Communautaires pour le Développement de...
  • hongqiao-liu1 As China Adjusts for “True Cost” of Rare Earths, What Does It Mean for Decarbonization?
    Anthony Maw: It is just another one of those "inconvenient truths". Western defense and security analysts often...

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000