• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • Benjamin Pohl, Climate Diplomacy

    Sustaining a climate for peace

    June 14, 2021 By Wilson Center Staff
    andre-klimke--IhgLixx7Z8-unsplash

    The original version of this article, by Benjamin Pohl, appeared on Climate Diplomacy.

    After years of derision under the Trump administration, NATO members are no doubt looking forward to the summit today as a harbinger of closer and more predictable transatlantic collaboration. Among the many issues on the table should be the endorsement of a climate security action plan.

    Given recent events in Eastern Europe, how to deal with Russia will loom large in the discussions – not least because of the subsequent meeting between presidents Biden and Putin. Particularly for the US, closer coordination within NATO on China will be just as big a priority. Whereas NATO governments agree that both China and Russia pose challenges to the Alliance, how to address these challenges threatens to be divisive. It is a safe bet to expect foreign policy commentators to focus on these differences. Yet this may overstate diversity in strategic outlook when in fact a lot is shared.

    The biggest of these shared interests relates to the climate crisis. Climate change was prominent in the bilateral US-UK discussions due to both governments’ investment of political capital into the coming COP in Glasgow. It also informed the G7 summit and will also be in the agenda of the first EU-US summit since 2014. More surprisingly, perhaps, it will also feature prominently in the NATO summit on June 14 which, insiders report, will endorse a climate security action plan.  

    Why would NATO devote time to climate security risks? There are essentially three reasons. The first relates to the symbolic significance of affirming that climate change is a threat to international peace and security that is already manifesting in many parts of the world. The Action Plan is hence a welcome sign that NATO members are committed to working together and facilitating multilateral collaboration around a topic that will only grow in importance for the Alliance.

    Continue reading on Climate Diplomacy. 

    Sources: Climate Diplomacy and Twitter. 

    Photo Credit: Apache attack helicopter in approach, Afghanistan, September 2020, courtesy of Andre Klimke on Unsplash.   

    Topics: climate change, environment, environmental security, NATO, security

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous souhaitons que le partenaire nous apporte son soutien technique et financier.
  • shutterstock_1858965709 Break the Bias: Breaking Barriers to Women’s Global Health Leadership
    Sarah Ngela Ngasi: Nous sommes une organisation féminine dénommée: Actions Communautaires pour le Développement de...
  • hongqiao-liu1 As China Adjusts for “True Cost” of Rare Earths, What Does It Mean for Decarbonization?
    Anthony Maw: It is just another one of those "inconvenient truths". Western defense and security analysts often...

Related Stories

  • Gayo,Village,,Ethiopia,-,June,19:,Women,And,Young,VillageTranslating Urgency Into Action on Water, Climate, and Security
  • Šabac,,Serbia,-,May,18,,2014:,People,Put,Sandbags,ToMerging the Environmental and Security Sectors in Climate Risk Responses
  • African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in the Bwabwata National Park (Buffalo core area) in the Zambezi Region of Namibia.Sustaining Shared Waters: An African Case Study
  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000