• woodrow wilson center
  • ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
  • Reading Radar

    The U.S. Military’s Role in Global Health; Motivating Behavioral Change Through Personal Health

    January 19, 2015 By Linnea Bennett

    RR-Global-Health-Picture-CCClimate change mitigation efforts are more broadly supported when they are framed as a public health issue, according to results recently published in Climatic Change. After polling U.S. participants with political identities ranging from very liberal to very conservative, authors Nada Petrovic, Jaime Madrigano, and Lisa Zaval found most participants, except those who identified as very conservative, believed “health” to be the most compelling reason to reduce fossil fuels. In an additional poll on whether or not air pollution is harmful to public health, both conservatives and liberals responded in the affirmative. However, if the question’s wording included fossil-fuel terminology, conservatives were less likely to agree that emissions are harmful to human health. These results suggest the idea of personal health, free of fossil fuels or other politicized rhetoric, could be a potential motivator for behavior change across a broader political spectrum.

    RR-Global-Health-Picture-DoAn October 2014 report from the Center for Strategic and International studies calls global health engagement a “key tool” for the Department of Defense. The U.S. military’s involvement in global health activities has increased substantially over the last decade, thanks to prolonged stability operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to authors J. Christopher Daniel and Katherine H. Hicks. One senior official “estimated that caring for Afghani nationals amounted at times to as much as 70-90 percent of the military medical workload.” President Obama also ordered 3,000 soldiers to Liberia last fall as part of the U.S. response to Ebola. However, many of the Pentagon’s efforts have been criticized for a lack of acknowledgement of local customs and failure to coordinate with civilian institutions and NGOs. With the 2011 establishment of a “global health engagement coordinator” and correlating office, the military is continuing its mission to engage in global health and is implementing new policies to counteract some of these criticisms. Along with better accommodating local customs and  building host-country and partner capacity, combatant commands are also now required to annually submit humanitarian assistance strategies and describe how proposed projects align with their respective campaign plans.

    Sources: Center for Strategic and International Studies, Climatic Change.

    Topics: Afghanistan, climate change, global health, Iraq, Liberia, military, mitigation, Reading Radar, security, U.S.

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Trending Stories

  • unfccclogo1
  • Pop at COP: Population and Family Planning at the UN Climate Negotiations

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • 49890944808_c7d6dfef74_c Why Feminism Is Good for Your Health
    Melinda Cadwallader: "Feminism materializes through investment in human capital and caregiving sectors of the economy...
  • 49890944808_c7d6dfef74_c Why Feminism Is Good for Your Health
    Melinda Cadwallader: People who refuse to acknowledge patriarchy are often the ones who benefit from it. So please, say...
  • Water desalination pipes A Tale of Two Coastlines: Desalination in China and California
    Dr S Sundaramoorthy: It is all fine as theory. What about the energy cost? Arabian Gulf has the money from its own oil....

Related Stories

No related stories.

  • woodrow
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2023. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. All rights reserved.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

  • One Woodrow Wilson Plaza
  • 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
  • Washington, DC 20004-3027

T 202-691-4000