• ecsp

New Security Beat

Subscribe:
  • mail-to
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Population
    • Environment
    • Security
    • Health
    • Development
  • Columns
    • China Environment Forum
    • Choke Point
    • Dot-Mom
    • Navigating the Poles
    • New Security Broadcast
    • Reading Radar
  • Multimedia
    • Water Stories (Podcast Series)
    • Backdraft (Podcast Series)
    • Tracking the Energy Titans (Interactive)
  • Films
    • Water, Conflict, and Peacebuilding (Animated Short)
    • Paving the Way (Ethiopia)
    • Broken Landscape (India)
    • Scaling the Mountain (Nepal)
    • Healthy People, Healthy Environment (Tanzania)
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact Us

NewSecurityBeat

The blog of the Wilson Center's Environmental Change and Security Program
Showing posts by Wilson Center Staff.
  • Chad Briggs: Dealing With Risk and Uncertainty in Climate-Security Issues

    ›
    July 21, 2010  //  By Wilson Center Staff

    We must do more than simply take our current understanding of climate-change risk and extrapolate it into the future, asserted Chad Briggs of the Berlin-based Adelphi Research in a video interview with the Wilson Center’s Environmental Change and Security Program.

    MORE
  • ‘Dialogue Television’ Interviews Paul Collier

    ›
    On the Beat  //  July 15, 2010  //  By Wilson Center Staff
    Watch below or on MHz Worldview

    According to last week’s guest on Dialogue, restoring environmental order and eradicating global poverty have become the two defining challenges of our era. The environmental horror unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico illustrates just how difficult it is to balance economic progress and protection of the planet. It provides an alarming example of how the search for resources and profit can lead to the plunder of nature. Host John Milewski speaks with Oxford University economist Paul Collier on his latest book, The Plundered Planet: Why We Must and How We Can Manage Nature for Global Prosperity. Scheduled for broadcast starting June 30th, 2010 on MHz Worldview channel.

    Paul Collier is professor of economics and director of the Center for the Study of African Economies at Oxford University. Formerly, he served as director of development research at the World Bank. He is the author of several books, including the award-winning The Bottom Billion.

    Note: A QuickTime plug-in may be required to launch the video.
    MORE
  • Top 10 Posts for June 2010

    ›
    What You Are Reading  //  July 1, 2010  //  By Wilson Center Staff
    Women Deliver and conflict minerals top the Beat this month:

    1. Dot Mom: Women Deliver in Climate Change Debate

    2. Copper in Afghanistan: Chinese Investments in Aynak

    3. Rare Earth: A New Roadblock for Sustainable Energy?

    4. Guest Contributor Caitlyn L Antrim, Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans: Trillions of Dollars of Minerals? Misuing Geology and Economics to the Detriment of Policy

    5. Guest Contributor Michael Kugelman, Wilson Center: Look Beyond Islamabad To Solve Pakistan’s “Other” Threats

    6. Afghanistan’s Mineral Wealth: Gold Mine, Curse, or Illusion?

    7. Backdraft: The Conflict Potential of Climate Mitigation

    8. VIDEO: Peter Gleick on Peak Water

    9. The Plundered Planet: A Discussion With Paul Collier

    10. Eye on Environmental Security: Natural Resource Frontiers at Sea
    MORE
  • The Feed for Fresh News on Population

    ›
    June 9, 2010  //  By Wilson Center Staff
    Changing Chinese demographics of labor force connected to worker protests from today’s Washington Post http://ow.ly/1V9R8

    New research on desired family size and child mortality in Reading Radar on @NewSecurityBeat. From #USAID and The #Lancet http://ow.ly/1UgYj

    Congrats to Suzanne Ehlers as new head of #PAI. Hoping for cont’d demography & security and population-environment work http://ow.ly/1TAzA

    Practical maternal health lessons in transportation and referral w/ examples from #India, #Bolivia, & #Ghana @MHTF #UNFPA http://ow.ly/1TzQZ

    Columbia University’s Grace Kodindo on @NewSecurityBeat with video interview on family planning in conflict zones http://ow.ly/1TzQg

    Grace Kodindo of “Grace Under Fire” talks family planning in conflict zones. #Chad #refugees #conflict #WilsonCenter http://ow.ly/1TuN1

    Follow Geoff Dabelko on Twitter for more population, health, environment, and security updates
    MORE
  • Women Deliver 2010: First Impressions

    ›
    Dot-Mom  //  June 8, 2010  //  By Wilson Center Staff
    Delivering Solutions for Girls and Women

    “We know how to intervene; there does not need to be a magical solution,” said Søren Pind, Denmark’s minister for development cooperation, at the June 7 opening ceremony of Women Deliver 2010.

    In its second year, the conference has gathered delegates from 146 countries representing hundreds of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), governments, and civil society organizations under the theme “Delivering Solutions for Girls and Women.” Delegates are working to share projects, policies, successes, and innovations in the field of maternal health and to develop strategies to meet Millennium Development Goal 5.

    “Recent trends show great progress and this is very encouraging,” said Gamal Serour, president of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), speaking of a recent study by the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). The study found that annual maternal mortality has dropped 34 percent–from 526,000 to 342,900–between 1980 and 2008. Nevertheless, Serour maintained that “we are far away from our goal for 2015.”

    Overcoming Tradition and Religious Barriers

    Investing in women’s health is not only the right thing to do, it is also economically advantageous. When women are healthy, they provide tremendous benefits to their families, communities, and countries. Women contribute to a majority of the small businesses and agricultural activities of developing countries and their unpaid work at home accounts for almost 33 percent of the world’s GDP. Unfortunately, over 215 million of these women do not have access to family planning services, resulting in unwanted pregnancies, childbirth, and maternal deaths.

    There are many barriers to family planning in developing countries, not the least of which are cultural and social traditions that can uphold negative gender-based norms. Tailoring campaigns to address these gender inequities was the subject of discussion at the “Cultural Agents of Change Delivering for Women” session, where panelists acknowledged that collaboration and partnership with a wide-range of actors–from members of the local legislature to civil society organizations and actors in the health sector–are necessary to facilitate change.

    Graciela Enciso of the Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social-Sureste in Mexico, added that advocacy campaigns to increase support for family planning should be “linked with research.” In many traditional societies, strict interpretations of religion are used to control and disempower women; donors and NGOs “need to think outside the religious box at every point,” said Mary E. Hunt, co-director at the Women’s Alliance for Theology, Ethics, and Ritual.

    Male Contraception, Gender Roles, and Family Planning

    “I think it is important not to hide behind our cultures and religion,” said Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, managing director of the World Bank. “We need to work with men and work together to overcome gender inequality.” “Male participation” has been a key theme echoed throughout Women Deliver and is often highlighted as a strategy for reducing maternal mortality.

    At the “Men Deliver: Men’s Role in Family Planning” breakout session, experts addressed how new and existing technologies in male contraception and shifting gender roles can help to scale up family planning interventions. “Reducing unwanted pregnancies can also be carried out through male contraception,” said John Townsend, vice president of the reproductive health program at the Population Council.

    Condoms are traditionally the main method of contraception for men, but usage rates quickly fall over time and to wear a condom “becomes the women’s responsibility,” said Townsend. To address issues around condom usage, development of alternative family planning technologies, such as gels and implants, is underway. As these technologies are being developed, however, it is important for program managers and donors to consider existing gender norms and the willingness of men to utilize new methods.

    In researching gender roles in family planning in Zambia, Holo Hochanda, the chief technical administrator of the Planned Parenthood Association of Zambia, determined that there are many entry points for male intervention and increased family planning. “Men are clients, policymakers, and service providers. Each of these roles provides an opportunity to discuss utilization of male contraception and gender inequities in family planning,” he said. “Men can be key mobilizers and agents for change.”

    For more coverage on Women Deliver 2010 click here and to learn more about the Wilson Center’s Maternal Health Dialogue Series visit the Global Health Initiative’s website here.
    MORE
  • Rare Earth: A New Roadblock for Sustainable Energy?

    ›
    June 7, 2010  //  By Wilson Center Staff


    The 2010 National Security Strategy emphasizes that energy independence is part of a larger strategy for national security, stating, “As long as we are dependent on fossil fuels, we need to ensure the security and free flow of global energy resources.”


    However, the alternatives to fossil fuels–such as wind energy, hybrid vehicles, and energy-efficient light bulbs–could also lead to dependence on international resources. They require minerals known as rare earth elements or minerals (REEs). REEs are required for producing the magnets necessary for a variety of goods, including precision-guided munitions, computer hard drives, lasers, communication and radar systems, satellites, and color televisions.

    But China has a virtual lock on the production of REEs. In response, U.S. policymakers requested the GAO produce a detailed assessment of REEs in the U.S. defense supply chain as part of the 2010 National Defense Authorization Act. At the same time, the Pentagon is changing its policies regarding acquiring and stockpiling REEs.

    Demand for Rare Earth Predicted to Rise

    CEO Mark Smith of Molycorp Minerals, a U.S. rare earth mining operation, told HardAssetsInvestor.com:
    Today the largest use of these magnets is in hard disk drives… We believe that may be changing as hybrid cars become more popular and the use of wind turbines becomes more widespread. Clearly, on a volumetric basis, these two new clean energy technologies could easily overtake hard disk drives in terms of the volume of permanent rare earth magnets required.


    Despite their name, REEs are not necessarily rare–known stocks and demand vary widely by element–but supplies of some key elements are short, reports Robin Bromby of The Australian.

    China Corners the Rare Earth Market

    The growing attention paid to REE supply stems more from the location of mining and production facilities rather than pure scarcity concerns. According to the GAO assessment, China produced 97 percent of rare earth oxides in 2009, and it has established economic protections on rare earth exports. The United States Magnet Material Association has estimated that China’s consumption of rare earth materials will outpace its supply between 2012-2015.

    “What we need to be careful of is that we don’t unknowingly change our dependence on foreign oil to a new dependence on Chinese rare earths,” Molycorp’s Smith told HardAssetsInvestor.com. While new technologies may change the type of battery used in hybrids, “the one thing that cannot change in electric vehicles or hybrid vehicles is the use of permanent rare earth magnets in the motors and generators. There is simply no substitute for those magnets,” said Smith.

    U.S. Seeks Secure Supplies

    Given the lack of substitutes, the United States is attempting to secure access to REEs. Known deposits exist in the United States, Australia, Brazil, India, Canada, South Africa, and Greenland. However, in order for the United States to procure secure access to REEs, they must both acquire mines and processing facilities for the multi-stage production process, which today takes place almost entirely in China.

    The GAO estimates it may take up to 15 years for the United States to produce a finished product. In that time, Chinese consumption is expected to have vastly increased and demand for certain REEs may be very high.

    Washington is taking this threat seriously. As pointed out by CNAS’ Christine Parthemore, the 180-day turnaround time on the GAO’s rare earth assessment was considerably shorter than for other assessments, including a plan for operational use of biofuels.

    The Pentagon is revamping its stockpiling practices, reducing bureaucratic barricades to changing quotas, broadening buying options, and growing the array of stockpiled resources, the Wall Street Journal reported, adding:

    The rising competition for raw materials has sparked fears in the U.S. military that some materials that once seemed abundant could suddenly become hard to get at any price. In 2008 the military suspended or limited sales of 13 commodities it had previously considered excess. Last year it added 14 materials to its list of resources it considers for stockpiling, including specialty steels, lithium and some rare-earth elements, taking the total to 68. More additions are expected, said Ms. Stead of the Defense National Stockpile Center.


    While it seeks secure supplies of REEs, the United States, and the defense community in particular, should take heed of the long history of minerals and conflicts around the world. Global demand for certain minerals has supported combatants in conflict areas; for example, control of coltan mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo, while producing only 1 percent of global supply, played a significant role in that country’s civil war.

    The switch to alternative transportation fuels could similarly produce new patterns of global resource demand that spur or support conflict–a phenomena that will be explored in an upcoming ECSP event, “Backdraft: The Conflict Potential of Climate Mitigation and Adaptation.”

    On the other hand, done correctly, mineral extraction could be a way to break the “resource curse” and increase cooperation rather than conflict. In Pakistan, “development and maintenance of an extractive mineral industry could revolutionize the Waziristan economy and infrastructure in the long-term,” says Natural Security, which could provide “an incentive for local cooperation.”

    Ultimately, the way that the United States seeks to slake its hunger for resources will determine whether it can stockpile its way to security.

    Tara Innes is a PhD student at the University of Maryland, studying conflict-environment linkages and an intern with ECSP.

    Photo Credit: Adaptation of Periodic Table, courtesy Flickr user Destinys Agent

    MORE
  • Top 10 Posts for May 2010

    ›
    What You Are Reading  //  June 1, 2010  //  By Wilson Center Staff
    Fragile states and food security top the Beat this month:

    1. VIDEO—Harriet Birungi: Challenges Facing HIV-Positive Adolescents in Kenya

    2. On the Beat: The Food Security Debate: From Malthus to Seinfeld

    3. Guest Contributor Michael Kugelman, Wilson Center: Look Beyond Islamabad To Solve Pakistan’s “Other” Threats

    4. As Somalia Sinks, Neighbors Face a Fight to Stay Afloat

    5. Copper in Afghanistan: Chinese Investment in Aynak

    6. Feed the Future: USAID’s Shah Focuses on Women, Innovation, Integration

    7. Eye on Environmental Security: USAID Launches GeoExplorer: Connecting Natural Resource Management Activities, Practitioners, and Communities

    8. Guest Contributor: Todd Walters, International Peace Park Expeditions: Imagine There’s No Countries: Conservation Beyond Borders in the Balkans

    9. DOD Measures Up On Climate Change, Energy

    10. Campus Beat: Finding a Home for Political Demography
    MORE
  • ‘Frontlines’ Interviews John Sewell: “Promoting Development Is a Risky Business”

    ›
    May 31, 2010  //  By Wilson Center Staff
    Q: Foreign assistance has had major achievements over the past 50 years. What are some examples?

    SEWELL: There have been many but off the top of my head I can think of three. First, the Green Revolution where the combined efforts of American aid and private foundations revolutionized agriculture in Asia. As a result, many more people lived a much longer time. Second, the efforts put into improving education, particularly of women and girls. The third is population growth. When I started working on development, the best predictions said that global population would rise to over 20 billion at the end of the 20th century. Now we know it will not go much above 9 billion and perhaps lower. That wouldn’t have happened without American leadership and funding.

    Q: What are the major failures of foreign assistance?

    SEWELL: Failures have occurred either because countries were not committed to development, or because aid agencies designed ineffective programs. But most major failures came about because aid was provided for political reasons— for Cold War purposes in Southeast Asia or the Middle East, not for economic and social development. And we should remember that promoting development is a risky business. If there were no failures, development agencies were being too cautious.

    But the more important failures are at the strategic level. Assistance really is only effective when governments and leaders want to speed economic growth, improve health and education, and address poverty. When the government isn’t committed to development, a lot of aid is wasted.

    That’s why the choice of countries is so important. Korea is one example. Korean leaders knew how to use foreign aid effectively to build agriculture and industry. Part of that assistance funded investments in health and education. We all know the result.

    Egypt, on the other hand, also has received large amounts of American assistance since 1979. But its growth rates are low and they still have one of the highest rates of adult illiteracy in the world.

    Perhaps the largest failure has been in Africa. Except for a small number of countries, Africa lags far behind other regions. The blame lies not just with African leaders but also with aid donors who have continued to provide assistance in ways that hinder development.

    Q: In what ways can global poverty be reduced quickly in the next three to four years?

    SEWELL: In the short term, it won’t happen. The global financial crisis makes that a certainty.

    The best estimates are that up to 90 million people will fall back into poverty because they will have lost jobs and livelihoods. The most important thing the U.S. can do in the near term is to continue to lead the reform of the international financial systems that are essential to restarting global economic growth, particularly in the developing world.

    Q: That’s the way to reduce poverty?

    SEWELL: In the short term, yes. But the U.S. can target aid to build poor peoples’ capacities and can make a great difference. That means aid for education, especially women, and to enable poor people to improve their health. And jobs are critical.

    I think the right goal is to empower people to move into the middle class.

    That means helping to provide technical assistance and in making low-cost credits for both farmers and small scale entrepreneurs. They will be the generators of jobs that enable men and women to move out of poverty.

    Q: Why do you say in one of your papers that economic growth alone will not eliminate poverty?

    SEWELL: Because it’s true. Growth does not automatically diminish poverty; it has to be complemented by government actions to share the gains from growth by investing in better health and education. For this you also need a competent state. That’s how the East Asian countries managed to develop so successfully. On the other hand, many Latin American countries have grown at decent rates but have lousy income distribution. But now countries like Brazil are starting to change. For instance, the Brazilian government now pays mothers to keep their children in school where they can get education and health care.

    Q: USAID has restrictions that inhibit advertising. How can the public and Congress be informed about the successes and importance of development assistance?

    SEWELL: USAID has been very timid about educating the public and Congress. I am not even sure that the earlier successful programs of development education exist anymore. Some steps are easy.

    USAID staff knows a lot about development. Why not send them out to talk to public groups around the country? USAID staff doesn’t even participate actively in the yeasty dialogue on development that goes on in the Washington policy community and they should be encouraged to do so. Other changes may require funding and perhaps legislation and the administration should work with the Congress to get them.

    Informing the public is particularly important now when there are two major processes underway to modernize U.S. development programs and Congress is rewriting the development assistance legislation.

    Q: Since China and Vietnam have both developed without democracy, how important is it to push for democracy and good governance? Are they really necessary?

    SEWELL: We need to separate democracy and governance. Very few of the successful developing countries have started out as democracies; India is the big exception. On the other hand, all of the successful countries have had effective governments to do what governments should do: provide security and public goods like health and education, establish the rule of law, and encourage entrepreneurship.

    We need to face the fact that no outsider, including the U.S., can “democratize” a country. But it can play an important role in helping to improve governance in committed poor countries. And one of the important parts of successful development is what a Harvard economist calls “conflict mediating institutions” that allow people to deal with the inevitable conflicts that arise within successful development.

    Q: You have said that we need to make markets work. How can we help poor people begin to trade when Europe, Japan, and the United States either block imports or subsidize exports?

    SEWELL: If you are serious about development, you have to give high priority to trade policy. Unfortunately, USAID seems to have very little voice in trade decisions.

    The U.S. needs to focus its development trade policy on the poorest countries. The highest priority should be dropping the remaining subsidies for U.S. production of highly subsidized agricultural products like cotton that can be produced very competitively in very poor countries.

    But many of these countries have difficulty selling goods in the U.S., not only because of subsidies, but also because they are not equipped to export. Transport costs are high as are the costs of meeting U.S. health and quality standards, and knowledge of marketing in America is scarce.

    Here’s where USAID can play an important complementary role. U.S. companies are already providing technical assistance, some with USAID support. But USAID can expand its trade capacity building programs and focus them on the poorer countries.

    Q: What about microcredit?

    SEWELL: Microcredit is a very important innovation, especially for empowering poor people, particularly poor women. It’s part of the solution to ending poverty.

    But there are other needs. In most poor countries, there are large groups of poor entrepreneurs who are not poor enough to get microcredit but who can’t get commercial banks to lend to them. These are people who produce products for sale— handbags, for instance—that employ 10 to 20 people, but they need capital and advice in order to grow. In the U.S., small businessmen used to borrow money from local banks.That’s how America grew. But similar institutions don’t exist in many poor countries.

    Q: We are involved in so many different programs—20 or 30 different federal agencies do some sort of foreign assistance— why not just invest in education and health and let each country figure out what their own development plan should be?

    SEWELL: A very good idea. I have long advocated that the U.S. should focus its programs on a few major development issues but I would go beyond just health and education. I add climate change and dealing with global health threats. We dodged the bullet on SARS [severe acute respiratory syndrome] and avian flu but we may not be so lucky in the future. And strengthening governance and strengthening weak states is essential.

    The real need now is for some mechanism that oversees and coordinates the multiplicity of agencies that have programs and expertise on these critical issues. Let’s hope that emerges from the current administration’s reviews of development policy

    John Sewell a senior scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, was interviewed by FrontLines Editorial Director Ben Barber. Originally published in USAID FrontLines, April 2010.
    MORE
Newer Posts   Older Posts
View full site

Join the Conversation

  • RSS
  • subscribe
  • facebook
  • G+
  • twitter
  • iTunes
  • podomatic
  • youtube
Tweets by NewSecurityBeat

Featured Media

Backdraft Podcast

play Backdraft
Podcasts

More »

What You're Saying

  • Closing the Women’s Health Gap Report: Much Needed Recognition for Endometriosis and Menopause
    Aditya Belose: This blog effectively highlights the importance of recognizing conditions like endometriosis &...
  • International Women’s Day 2024: Investment Can Promote Equality
    Aditya Belose: This is a powerful and informative blog on the importance of investing in women for gender equality!...
  • A Warmer Arctic Presents Challenges and Opportunities
    Dan Strombom: The link to the Georgetown report did not work

What We’re Reading

  • U.S. Security Assistance Helped Produce Burkina Faso's Coup
  • https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/02/02/equal-rights-amendment-debate/
  • India's Economy and Unemployment Loom Over State Elections
  • How Big Business Is Taking the Lead on Climate Change
  • Iraqi olive farmers look to the sun to power their production
More »
  • ecsp
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Wilson Center
  • Contact Us
  • Print Friendly Page

© Copyright 2007-2025. Environmental Change and Security Program.

Developed by Vico Rock Media

Environmental Change and Security Program

T 202-691-4000