Reading Radar:
Energy and Climate Change in the Context of National Security

Share |
Posted by Schuyler Null // Thursday, October 28, 2010

“Climate Change and Security,” a short briefing by Paul Rogers of the Oxford Research Group, examines the recent trend of framing climate change in terms of a national security threat and presents some of the pros and cons of this viewpoint. Rogers says the recent uptick in interest by the military is expected – and welcomed – because military planners often perform more long-term analyses than other policymakers. However, Rogers also cautions that the military, in its role as protector of the state, will naturally focus on adapting to the effects of climate change rather than preventing them. Thus, while this willingness to think long-term is appreciated, work remains to convince the international security community of the importance of carbon-cutting measures as well.

“Fueling the Future Force: Preparing the Department of Defense for a Post-Petroleum Era,” by Christine Parthemore and John Nagl of CNAS, is a comprehensive policy paper arguing for the U.S. military to aim for the ability to operate all its systems on non-petroleum fuels by 2040. Parthemore and Nagl outline a broad set of recommendations that address DOD’s consumption habits, leadership structure, finances, acquisition process, and mission goals. Notable, in the context of Paul Rogers’ warning, is that the authors’ argument is essentially one of supply and demand, rather than for cutting emissions to reduce the effects of climate change: “…while many of today’s weapons and transportation systems are unlikely to change dramatically or be replaced for decades, the petroleum needed to operate DOD assets may not remain affordable, or even reliably available, for the lifespans of these systems.”

Print this post
Topics: , , , , , ,

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Search

Loading
Across My Desk adaptation Afghan DHS Afghanistan Africa aging agriculture Algeria Arctic Asia Australia Backdraft Bangladesh Beat on the Ground biodiversity biofuels Bolivia Brazil Building Commitment Burundi Cambodia Campus Beat Canada Chad China climate change Colombia community-based conflict Congress conservation consumption cooperation COP-15 COP-16 COP-17 Crossroads Cuba democracy demography development disaster relief Dot-Mom DRC eco-tourism economics Ecuador education Egypt energy environment environmental health environmental peacemaking environmental security Ethiopia Europe Eye On family planning Feed the Future flooding FOCUS food security foreign policy forests From Durban From Ethiopia From Wilson funding GBV gender geoengineering Ghana global health GMHC-10 Haiti HIV/AIDS humanitarian ICFP India Indonesia international environmental governance Iran Iraq Israel Japan Jordan JPR Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kyrgyzstan land Latin America Lebanon Liberia Libya livelihoods Madagascar Malawi Mali maternal health MDGs media Mexico Middle East migration military minerals mitigation Morocco Mozambique NATO natural resources NCSE 2012 Nepal Nicholas Kristof Niger Nigeria Nigeria Beyond nutrition oceans On the Beat Pakistan Papua New Guinea peace parks Peru PHE PHE Champion Philippines Planet 2012 podcast Pop Audio Pop Tweets population poverty protected areas QDDR QDR Reading Radar Reading the QDDR REDD Rio+20 Russia Rwanda Sahel sanitation Saudi Arabia security Senegal Sierra Leone Somalia South Africa South Asia Sri Lanka State Sudan SXSW Syria Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Top 10 Tunisia Turkey U.S. Uganda UK UN urbanization USAID Uzbekistan video Vietnam water World Bank Yemen Yemen Beyond the Headlines You Are Invited youth Zimbabwe